User talk:Erlyrisa

I have declined the PROD-nomination. The article does indeed need references, though. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Yeah I dunno, --where are the doctors!? , or the manufacturers' of the implements they use. The medical tools section is very bland, especially so when comparing to the metal and wood sections... I guess it highlights population demographics.

,but on a side note, I don't really care, I just went through a writing stint on Wikipedia when I first found out about it, and saw a few holes about a topic that I happened to know a little about.

The article

]

Proposed deletion of Rotary reciprocation

The article Rotary reciprocation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oscillating reciprocation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary term

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

S.char.|.mi.| ::e Shleimiel203.17.70.53 (talk) 06:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Remote Control Phenomenon, Erlyrisa!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Are you able to help address the improvement tags placed on this article? Thanks for your help.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about

Boleyn (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Remote Control Phenomenon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article appears to be gibberish. Google returns no results on the topic except for mirrors of Wikipedia. No other pages link to the article and it contains no verifiable citations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. v/r - TP 15:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]