User talk:Esnupi
September 2009
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Ventania. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm from Brazil I speak Portuguese do not know English to these sources I getting the wikipedia of Brazil and translating with a program for English, reliable sources
I am the good references that I did Filion
Cleanup requests
Hi Esnupi, could you please do the following steps for the translated articles you create?
- Add the template message {{rough translation|Portuguese}} to the top of the article so that an editor fluent in both languages can improve it. (example edit)
- Add an interlanguage link, such as [[pt:Goioxim]] to Goioxim. This creates a link to the original article pt:Goioxim. (example edit) More information at Help:Interlanguage links and pt:Ajuda:Guia de edição/Interwikis. You don't have to create any other links, such as "it:" or "no:"; a bot will do that for you.
- Add a category, such as Category:Cities, towns and villages in Paraná State for Goioxim. (example edit) It's usually easy to find the right category: pt:Goioxim is in pt:Categoria:Municípios do Paraná, and the "English" link there goes to Category:Cities, towns and villages in Paraná State.
- If you can, for short articles add a stub template, such as {{ParanáBR-geo-stub}} for Goioxim (example edit). It can be hard to find the right template, though, so if you're not sure, use {{Brazil-geo-stub}}.
Thanks, Melchoir (talk) 01:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
I'll try to see if I understand
- If you don't understand me, try these links for explanation:
- Melchoir (talk) 01:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
do you have any email or msn orkut something that I can contact?
you are in England or the United States?
Lapa, Paraná
Thanks for articles like
]Speedy deletion nomination of Quarto Centenário
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cruzeiro (satellite city)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the
Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
Whoa, slow down!
Hi! It's apparent that English isn't your first language, which isn't a problem in most cases. However, the sheer number of these too-short and poorly written stubs is creating a massive amount of cleanup for other editors. Please don't add any more unless and until the others are cleaned up. Thanks. --
One more thing: Virtually all of these entries look to be machine translations; this is a violation of copyright. Please don't use machine translations, please don't violate copyright and please consider contributing to the Brazilian Portuguese Wikipedia. Thanks.
- (On the other hand, using {{Translated page}} per Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate would clear up the copyright issue.) Melchoir (talk) 02:29, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
ANI discussion
Esnupi,
These articles don't seem to be translated from another Wikipedia
Hello Esnupi. I'm leaving this note here since others may want to know the status of the new articles you've created. Per [1] there seems to be no Brazilian Wikipedia, though there is a Portuguese one. One of Esnupi's new articles is Clevelândia, which is *not* a translation from pt:Clevelândia, a fact which which is easily seen even by people who don't know the language. The Portuguese article, if fully translated, would meet our standards here. My own vote would be to go ahead with the deletion of Esnupi's new articles on places in Brazil until such time as proper versions can be made. EdJohnston (talk) 15:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
tao you saying that I did not take Wikipedia articles in Portuguese and so you guys go on the wiki in Portuguese and translated for you to see if not— Preceding unsigned comment added by Esnupi (talk • contribs)
- Please stop creating poor articles, like this one. Clubmarx (talk) 17:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Esnupi, please stop. Because your articles appear to have been machine translated from Portuguese, they are not proper English. Noone understands a word of what you have written. Please stop. 94.212.31.237 (talk) 17:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
now I am better the archives that I you editing, go to be fuck, of the one tesao to type these archives — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esnupi (talk • contribs)
because vain they do not start to burn thread
Blocked
- By the way, I should also point out that after discussion of this matter at the administrators' noticeboard, I initiated a mass deletion of all of your new content. Between your incivility, the sheer number of poorly written articles and the fact that cleaning these up would require hundreds of hours of volunteer time, it was all I could do. --talk) 03:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)]
Olá!
Olá, Esnupi...parece que você tem arranjado uns problemas por aqui. Os artigos que você criou são traduções automáticas de textos em português, e por serem traduções não-humanas, são praticamente incompreensíveis para as pessoas que falam inglês. Você foi bloqueado por ter mandado os editores acima "se fuderem", e por ter criado vários artigos de baixíssima qualidade. Daqui a menos de 48 horas, você poderá voltar a editar, esse bloqueio serve para que você pense bem se vale a pena continuar editando por aqui, pois caso você insista com suas edições, poderá ser bloqueado por tempo indefinido. Obrigado, Victão Lopes I hear you... 15:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Profane comment
Hello Esnupi. If you have any desire to continue editing here on Wikipedia, I hope you will avoid making further comments like the one I just deleted from your Talk page. More such comments and you will most likely be indefinitely blocked. Since you have a desire to create articles, I hope you will settle down and stick around for a while. EdJohnston (talk) 20:46, 17 September 2009 (UTC)