User talk:Extrafacts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Hello, Extrafacts!
helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 09:14, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Getting started
  • Getting mentored
  • How to:
    create your first article
  • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page

external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:14, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

May 2010

external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Pigbag. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 08:36, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Dr. Calculus

Please understand that Wikipedia has a

verifiability policy that you must adhere to, so you need to stop trying to add mentions of the obscure mid-'80s pop group Dr. Calculus to articles on Wikipedia. The group's music is not directly related to the articles you've been adding it to, and the group isn't even notable enough to warrant a mention at all, except where it's already very briefly mentioned in the Stephen Duffy and Professor Calculus
articles.

It sounds like you've been listening to this music and feel it ought to be mentioned as an overlooked early example of genres it musically resembles. Unfortunately, you're going to have to realize that anyone who listens to a lot of music eventually "discovers" a song or album that bears some resemblance to a genre the artist isn't normally associated with; it's not that uncommon. For such a discovery to be worth mentioning, it needs to be something that got some real press or published academic coverage. See Techno#Proto-techno for examples that do get mentioned in an article, because they can be found out in the press, and a good way of writing about them. Then see Talk:Acid house#What about Charanjit Singh? for an example that doesn't get mentioned, because aside from an attention-grabbing headline, the only real press that music got was carefully worded to distance it from the genre in question. —mjb (talk) 03:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]