User talk:Falkmart

Greetings,

There has been some speculation about your image Corvus_corone-Nest.jpg over at Wikiproject Birds. We're not sure that it is correctly identified as a nest belonging to a Carrion Crow due to the size of the brood, the appearance of the eggs and the location. It might help us positively identify the species if you could give us your reasoning for why you believe the eggs belong to a Carrion Crow. 0x0077BE [^talk/_contrib] 18:19, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, bin der Oli (User:Temnothorax) ich habe neue Bilder von meiner Mantis auf Wikimedia Commons veröffentlich und mehr: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Temnothorax

Frohe Kätzchen

Temnothorax (talk) 13:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This official government site for Greenland refers to wild Rangifer tarandus as Caribou. They refer to introduced populations as Reindeer. What are your thoughts on this? Howpper (Howpper) 17:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I Think in North America and Greenland caribou often refers to wild Rangifer tarandus, whereas tame Rangifer tarandus are often referred to as reindeer.--Falkmart (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for your contributions to La Crosse River Conservancy. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and not remotely ready for the mainspace. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 19:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:La Crosse River Conservancy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 19:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Falkmart! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 19:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]