User talk:Farmershire375

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for letting me know. Farmershire375 (talk) 22:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Matthew Gerrard, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop your disruptive editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've cited a reliable source. I'm learning from my mistakes. Farmershire375 (talk) 23:04, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Farmershire375. You appear to be implementing many of the same changes as Pleaseme23, do you have any connection to that user? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 21:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:SPI would be a good thing to do.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Actually, i am connected to PleasureMe23, telling the truth this time. Farmershire375 (talk) 22:09, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

nope, I don't have any connection to the user Pleasureme23. Farmershire375 (talk) 21:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 21:49, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason was that when PleasureMe23 was blocked for vandalism, it was because I haven’t sourced it. Well, I learned my mistake and fix what was wrong by adding source articles to the edits it made. I was trying to be a good Samaritan. This is why I want to be unblock because PleasureMe23 vandalism the edits without sources. So I decided to source the articles and follow Wikipedia rules. Farmershire375 (talk) 21:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I would like a second chance on editing Wikipedia. Farmershire375 (talk) 17:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Graham87, you just reverted all of my good edits, why, these edits are perfect. Why did you reverted them aganist me. I’ve just retired PleasureMe23, this time I’m a changed editor, adding actual sources. This is just unfair for me. Farmershire375 (talk) 18:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you persist in being a pest, I will revoke TPA. You're a sock. Sock edits normally get reverted. The only thing you can do now is to request an unblock, although it's highly unlikely you will be unblocked. You should do so at Pleasureme23's Talk page because the unblock request should come from the master account. I've just removed the Retired banner from the master account Talk page; that's disruptive, and if you do it again, I'll revoke TPA on both accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]