User talk:FimusTauri

Archives

/Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hello, FimusTauri. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FimusTauri. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FimusTauri. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I read your objections to my text, but I do not understand what is contrary to cosmological knowledge. The energy of the universe equals zero because negative energy of gravity "cancels" the positive energy of matter. Therefore, the energy of the universe is zero. However, there must be positive (normal) energy and negative (gravitational) energy so that the energy of the universe is zero and the universe could create matter. Everything I wrote above results from the article. So what is incorrect here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.173.176.198 (talk) 13:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Isham, a British quantum cosmologist, in “Quantum Cosmology and the Origin of the Universe” points out that there still needs to be “ontic seeding” to create the positive and negative energy in the first place, even if on balance its sum is zero. (I apologize for writing from different IPs, but this is because of my job. The first part is also mine.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.173.176.135 (talk) 16:08, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain to me what is at odds with your cosmological understanding in the article "zero-energy universe"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.221.121.73 (talk) 16:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]