User talk:Flugscham
Hello, Flugscham, and
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 19:17, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi
Welcome to Wikipedia. I'm not trying to make your life hard and I appreciate your interest in adding to our article
As I explained in the
But you are not doing that. Instead you reposted the same text which has the same problem I complained about before. You "re-reverted" without discussion. That's the opening of an
- It is also argued that already emitted greenhouse gases need to be removed, hereby using technologies like remove greenhouse gas from the atmosphereand, thus, evaluated as to whether this could help to reverse global warming
- It is also argued that already emitted greenhouse gases need to be removed, hereby using technologies like
Besides the problem that pyrogenic CSS isn't in the body of the article, there is a
At the risk of charges that I am also edit warring, I will remove it one more time and then stop. Now that you have been made aware of the problems here, you will be expected to NOT simply put it back the same way. You can either add it in the body in a way that addresses some of the issues or you can start a thread on the article talk page where we can continue discussion the edits content. I'm posting here at your user talk page because I am mostly writing about behavior and trying to pass on helpful tips. We can use some more great climate editors, and this post is intended to help and welcome you, not to pick a fight.
Journal ranking
Hi - I really like your addition to the Journal ranking article as it makes the article more balanced and accurate. However, your last two sentences read like an opinion (editorial) and are not supported by a reliable reference, so I removed those two sentences.
Instead of controlling academics by implementing a simple performance measurement system that is based on rankings, universities strive to hire top scholars and create an atmosphere of trust and support. An analysis of the behavior of professors in Germany, where traditionally no performance measurement systems based on journal rankings are in place but the hiring process is more rigorous than, for example, in North America, demonstrates that they are self-motivated also without journal rankings and partly work more hours.
Although the statement makes sense intuitively, and I would agree with it personally, we need to support what we write with
Copy and pasting
We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's