User talk:ForcedAnonymity

Your recent editing history at Paolo Banchero shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source When editing Paolo Banchero and other articles please add proper sources.Zamekrizeni (talk) 23:40, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Reliable or not, if it is being featured alongside a popular headline it definitely has the ability to cause damage anyways. ForcedAnonymity (talk) 23:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I saw the warning after my last edit. It was not intentionally ignored. Does this reply count as an edit? If so, I apologize. ForcedAnonymity (talk) 00:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]