User talk:Fourlaxers

Hi Fourlaxers! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• To clarify, as was explained in the discussion that you started at
  WP:TONE. --AussieLegend (✉) 21:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tai Kamiya, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 00:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi; I just reverted your edit on the Severus Snape page. As per, for example, the Chicago Manual of Style, possessives for names that end in "s" are given by "'s", and not just the apostrophe (which is how possessive for plural nouns is given). The only exceptions to this rule are names that end in an eeze sound (such as "Xerxes"), and for historical reasons, "Jesus" when referring to the figure from Christianity. So "Sirius", "Severus", "Greenglass", all take possessives as "'s". Magidin (talk) 18:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nocturnal Animals. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

You have received prior warnings about edit warring and disruptive editing. Please familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style, which clearly states that we do "not make analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about information found in a primary source". Continued reversions to maintain unencyclopedic edits will result in your being blocked. Grandpallama (talk) 18:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Grown Ups 2, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• You need to stop adding your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. This includes adding your own personal interpretation of a film's reception. We use reliable sources for this, such as
  WP:ANI and ask to have you blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]