User talk:Frederich Davison

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Frederich Davison. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Frederich Davison|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creep^Talk 12:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. I am not paid by anyone. By contrast, it seems that you have a certain bias against this particular Singaporean. Your accusation that these edits are 'promotional' is completely ridiculous. The language used is already neutral and objective, stating only the facts, and the sources used are also used in articles on other famous entrepreneurs like Steve Jobs.Frederich Davison (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frederich Davison! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)