User talk:Frongle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frongle (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

"Alison: prove I'm abusing multiple accounts, per your block. You can't do it. Reverse block now."

Decline reason:

Wikipedia:CheckUser. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • (edit conflict) Checkuser shows you have been logging in and out of this account to evade blocks. Not only that, but you've done so before. Hence the rangeblock, too - Alison 14:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Patently false. But that'll all come out in the wash. I got what I wanted, I think. As soon as you block my /24, I'll be happy. Frongle (talk) 14:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • You're actually on a /20, and have the sole enjoyment of it. Or had - Alison 14:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]