User talk:FutureNJGov/archive4

Haha, thanks. What else do you think we should bring up to FL/FA status before it being allowed to be a featured topic though? Bsroiaadn^Talk 17:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Continental Airlines Arena? The only place they've played (until next season begins) as the New Jersey Devils, that wouldn't need to be GA/FA? Bsroiaadn^Talk 02:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Yea, I was talking about a game-by-game record for the individual seasons, sorry if I didn't clarify. And so the seasons don't need to be great, just good enough...gotcha. Yea, I guess the buildings wouldn't be required. Too bad we don't have any hockey-related featured topics to go by....but that'll make it just that much better when we make it a featured topic. Haha. How much more do you think should be added to

2003-04 New Jersey Devils season other than the home and road records (if we can find them)? Bsroiaadn^Talk 23:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

That link I saw in history was red, could you please post me here the correct one? If there is an deal, that in NHL the names will be writen without diacritics, as could be seen in television, I understand. But I want to know where it is written. Thanks. --Aktron (t|c) 16:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you deleted this information "While Trujillo did say this, on June 29, 2007, the band played "The Other New Song" again with only a new guitar solo and some minor changes to the vocals."

If you watch the video of Metallica's performance on 6/29/07, you'll see that it's the same song from last year's Summer tour with the minor changes added above, Rob said only bits and pieces of that song would be used on the new album and and the band ended up playing the song in whole which contradicts what Rob said, granted they still may not use that song on the new album but we don't know that. Why would you delete that information and call it vandalism? That makes no sense to me and is almost offensive because I'm a big Metallica fan.

Can you also post your response at

Hi. A while back, you uploaded Image:Wilsonnflfootball.jpg. On the image description page, you don't explicitly state that you are the author of the image. Could you replace the {{GFDL}} template with {{GFDL-self}} and explicitly state that you took the photograph, or, if you are not the author, specify who the author is? Thanks. --BigΔT 14:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --BigΔT 14:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the image fails

But, ofcourse, before making it it'd have to be brought up at WikiProject Ice Hockey, I just figured I'd ask another Devils fan if it's worth it or not, first. Bsroiaadn^Talk 06:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, cool. Well, I brought it up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey#Two things, along with my new version of the {{ice hockey}} template which I personally think is better, it's not a major change but still better. And I doubt anyone will be against the task force, but it's supposed to be brought up anyway. Bsroiaadn^Talk 15:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it took me so long, I was busy most of the weekend. Anyway, the New Jersey Devils task force has been created. Please add your name to the list of participants and make any other changes to the page that you'd like to do, I threw it up quickly cause I have to go finish something else soon. I'm probably gonna be kinda busy for the next couple days, unfortunately. Bsroiaadn^Talk 19:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't blame you for being 'peeved' at myself and Djsasso. It just that 'currently' a majority backs me, as does the official team websites. PS- I wouldn't blame you if you 'reported' both of us (Dj and I). GoodDay 20:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I suggest you should (reports us). GoodDay 20:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(By the way, I've retained my original work on the draft history at User:Skudrafan1/Complete Buffalo Sabres draft history, which should make inclusion of draft choices on individual season articles easier when they are created, eventually.)

Anyway, when the discussion about

Just perusing some examples of spoken articles as I prepare for a few of my own, and yours were some of the best I've found. Just thought I'd share that with you. Hope you plan on more! Reason turns rancid 01:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you may or may not know, some of us at WP:HOCKEY have banded together and are trying to get the various NHL Trophy pages to FT status. It is a big job and any assistance you would be willing to offer would be most appreciated. You can find out more

I've deleted two of the images you uploaded: Image:Jakedelhomme.png and Image:Delhomme practice.jpg. They were licensed under Creative Commons licenses that prohibit commercial use and the creation of derivative works, which makes them unacceptable on Wikipedia. The only Creative Commons licenses that are allowed on Wikipedia are the Attribution and Attribution-Sharealike licenses. --Carnildo 21:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heya. I'm thinking that a Star Wars film (as opposed to most other films) has such extraordinary cultural ties and media coverage to satisfy a rigorous notability test. In fact, strictly speaking in terms of

Note: You have received this because your name is on

Knowing you are a Metallica fan and experienced with featured articles, I, a fellow member you must know from the Wikiproject Ice Hockey, would like to request you to help me improve the article to FA status. I've expanded it greatly during August and September and I think it's almost there. However, there are probably copyediting issues that need to be addressed. If you could lend me a hand, telling me what could be improved and doing some copyediting work, (English is not my primary language), I'd be thankful. --Serte ^{[ Talk · Contrib ]} 09:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, how ya been? Hockey season's back, and so am I. I'm not sure how active you are right now, but have you finished the draft list? I still want to get the Devils to be a featured topic. I may not edit as often as I'd like to, but I hope to make more edits soon. In the mean time, to help get me back into it, is there anything that you can think of that I can help with? Or even do by myself if you'd rather me not touch something you're finishing. Bsroiaadn^Talk 04:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha, it's alright. Law school, huh? That's pretty cool man, I guess you're serious about the Future New Jersey Governor thing. The problem I ran into with the individual seasons last time was there weren't many sources, and there were fewer and fewer the further back I went. Stats, hockeyDB has that covered, but as far as attendance and game-by-game...that's going to be very difficult to find unless I can find some books or something with them. I'll try, though. That's good, that page really needed to be worked on...he definitely deserves it. About the picture, maybe someone could ask the people with pictures of Scotty on flickr to change the licenses or upload one under a free license? We may get lucky. Yea, it's great man, so excited. You got seasons tickets? That's awesome. I wish I could get them...let's just say I'll be at my computer tomorrow at 9AM (when single-game tickets go on sale). Haha. The one I want the most is the home-opener...but that's also the one everyone else wants to most too, so I'd be lucky to get those. Bsroiaadn^{Let's Go Devils!} 02:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You either nominated a

Hi, I noticed that you commented a while back when List of World Tag Team Champions (WWE) was a Featured List candidate. I have recently nominated the List of WCW World Heavyweight Champions for Featured List status. Members of WikiProject: Professional Wrestling are a little hesitant to comment, as they want to avoid accusations of a conflict of interest. I'd like to get some unbiased opinions, so I was wondering if you could help. If you have chance this week, would you be able to look over this list and give your comments? Thank you. GaryColemanFan 02:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You mentioned last time we talked that you needed a picture of Scott Stevens for the article. Well, make sure you get to the game on December 7th because, if you didn't know, it's "Scott Stevens Hall of Fame Night" so you'll have a chance to get a picture of him there. You should probably ask anyone else that you know is going to take pictures so you have more to choose from. I'm going, but I'd be too far to get a decent picture, unfortunately. Ofcourse, this is assuming that Scotty would be there....but I see no reason why he wouldn't be, there'd probably be a lot of angry people if he didn't show up. Haha. Bsroiaadn^Talk 03:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I suppose we could do that....but then someone could always come along and claim that we could take a picture of him and upload it as free-use at any point. Unfortunately, there happens to be a lot of people like that on here. Not sure why they spend their time trying to delete perfectly good pictures, but ya know. Anyway, have a good time at the game tomorrow night. I don't see any reason why you wouldn't be going. I'll be there too...I'd look for you, but I have no idea what you look like. Haha. Also, if you ever start working on the season articles again, these may help. I haven't read them all yet, but the one I read is pretty good and is probably useful. It gives us a solid reference as well. I'm posting this as a note for myself as well, so don't think I'm pushing it onto you. Bsroiaadn^Talk 04:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all

I totally knew that but I couldn't figure out why they were making that edit to the page, must have been blind and not seen the legend for what that meant. Assumed it was vandalism. --Djsasso (talk) 23:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, you can be trusted to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting