User talk:Fuzzibloke

Reply

Any article that has been

WP:AfD where you can plead your case and we can see what the community as a whole thinks. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 14:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I have undeleted your article and sent it over to

WP:AfD. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Randall Travel so that you may argue your case for inclusion. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 14:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Undeletion

It seems that you want the article back. The place to go is: Wikipedia:Deletion review. That page is especially for the undeletion of articles. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 15:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How?Fuzzibloke 14:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Log Chasm

I have added a "{{

Diez2 03:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposing to merge
List of basic classics topics to Classics

Seeking concensus on proposed merger at Talk:Classics. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 01:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Reply

Hey, that message was an error. If you see history of that article I have not edited it or tagged it for deletion. Sorry for the confusion. --

talk · contribs) 21:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Refs

I did the first couple refs in the travel company article. Hopefully I did them right, and you can use them as a model for the rest of the citations. Basically it's this format:

<ref name=aito>
{{cite web
 |url    = http://www.aito.co.uk/ewebeditpro4/upload/AITO%20TRAVEL%20COMPANY%20WINNERS%202007.DOC
 |title  = 2007 AITO Award Winners
 |author = AITO
 |work   = AITO press release
 |date   = 15 January 2008
 |accessdate = 11/30/08
 |quote  = 
}}
</ref>

And then if you use the same ciation again you just put <ref name=aito/> Good luck. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Oops, gulp, looks like I put the cite (at least most of it) twice. I hope that didn't throw you. I'll go have a look. I also meant to mention that anyone can improve the citations on an article, but it was nice of you to do it. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DRV

Thanks for your contribution at DRV. Your comments seem to run into mine though. May I suggest prefacing them with a bullet and bold-faced summary such as

Overturn

as this is the usual style. This may help readers better understand the flow of the discussion. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK

I'll do that, thanks.Fuzzibloke (talk) 07:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge Ancient History

This is an automated message from

Cambridge Ancient History, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://histories.cambridge.org/collection?id=set_cambridge_ancient_history

.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

talk) 21:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply

]