User talk:Gdavidp

Welcome!

Hello, and

• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

04:06, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thanks

		The Original Barnstar
		Hey hey, That ref messup was freaken me out, I had no idea what was going on, thanks man, have this barnstar †he Bread 01:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Glad to help out... Gdavidp 21:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep on changing the Nellie Connally article? Jackie O never tried to leap out of the car, she went up to grab JFK's brain that got blasted to the front of the car. —The preceding

The above poster has been blocked, thanks for the info. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 01:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating this page. Great subject. I started a discussion page there for some Q&A. I would love to have your input. Turlo Lomon 01:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've just deleted the article *******1, which you created as an empty page. Was there a reason that you created this ... this is the third time an article of this title has been deleted. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 19:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think VandalProof put a revert of an already existing speedy delete page just at the same time as the page had been deleted. -Gdavidp 19:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh - I think I understand. I also see the article is now protected from re-creation, which seems wise. Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 21:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Every now and then that happens even if you're not using VP. I think it requires a very close timing of the deletion and the editor clicking on "Save page". If you click save a second earlier, your saves take and are then deleted with the article. A second later and you get the message that the article was deleted. Takes a very tight split-second to unintentionally recreate it without knowing it. Fan-1967 21:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There was some vandalism in the retailing article (someone put an ad in it), and you responded by reverting to a previous version. Unfortunately, the version you went back was too far in the past. Now all the links and graphics are gone, and work undone. I am reverting it back to the version right before the article was vandalized by user "Akuvodapainting" (whose personal page also reads as an advertisement, so I have serious doubts about this user).Hope you don't mind --Nicolo Machiavelli 11:24, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:AcademyModelAeronauticsLogo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

talk) 22:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards,

Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]