User talk:Gdbanks
A tag has been placed on
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 22:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages you have created as it is considered vandalism. If you contest the deletion please follow the instructions that are clearly shown on the deletion notice. WebHamster 22:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)]
among editors.
Blatant Advertising Warning
Please discontinue creating the ABELdent article because it is considered blatant advertising by Wikipedia's
RE: Deletion of abeldent
Gdbanks, the issue was that you were recreating an article numerous times that was identified by users and another administrator (other than myself) as something that qualifies under the
- These are the warnings I'm mentioning when I say "told numerous" times. That particular article was under the scrutiny of the Criteria for Speedy Deletion. It is advisable not to recreate it if that's the case.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)]
AfD nomination of Comparison of dental practice management software
An article that you have been involved in editing, Comparison of dental practice management software, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of dental practice management software. Thank you. TableManners U·T·C 06:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of PracticeWorks
The article PracticeWorks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced promo-style article tagged for OR since 2007 and COI since 2009. Software looks to fail WP:NSOFT and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:32, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dentrix
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 23:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)