User talk:Georgina V Hobart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Georgina V Hobart, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions
.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called

Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me
}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 22:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution
. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

DC Extended Universe

Stop moving categories. It requires a discussion at

WP:COMMONNAME. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:03, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Please stop these undiscussed mass changes. DC Extended Universe may be unofficial but it's the
requested move disussion at Talk:DC Extended Universe. If there is consensus to move the main article then other moves will probably follow. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Oh, sorry, didn't mean to offend anyone. The way I worked was to edit all of those pages at the same time, and for the last ten minutes all I've been doing is click save (no mouse here). I gave my reasoning in those two refs and the summary on the
Justice League Universe page. Check the summary. I knew I'd have to do it all at once because there are so many pages using the incorrect term "DC Extended Universe". Georgina V Hobart (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
I'm going to use rollback on a series of your changes because it's a lot more work to revert them without rollback. The use of rollback does not mean that I consider the edits to be vandalism. If there is consensus for a move later then there are tools to change the links quickly. For now it's best to consistently use the same name. PrimeHunter (talk) 19:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The First Chapter

Please stop

Episodes 1 and 2 (Inhumans)
.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. The IMAX release does not have an official release name. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC) & @ 04:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes 1 and 2 (Inhumans). Seriously. Cut it out. You've been told numerous times now that "The First Chapter" is not an official name for these episodes, and have been directed to various talk page discussions at Talk:Inhumans (TV series) where this has been discussed. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Previous comment deleted

Hi. I had made my earlier comment based on your edits, but now I see that these are not widely accepted and are being challenged, so I have withdrawn that earlier comment. So please ignore. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 11:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I specifically said you should ignore my earlier edit. What part of that is so difficult to understand? I wrote it on the assumption that you were an established editor who kew the rules and before seeing that your edits were being challenged. I then immediately deleted that comment and left you a note in its place for you to ignore the earlier one because I knew that you would go and see what it was and would most likely respond — as you did. So, do as you have been asked and discuss the matter on the talk page. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 11:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on

section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion
, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on

section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion
, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

stop You are about one

blocked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

October 2017

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 22:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: You are on the express highway heading for the exit marked "Indefinite Block." I strongly advise you to change course while you still can. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]