User talk:Golfbravoecho

Edit warring

Hello, reverting an editor more than three times in 24 hours constitutes edit warring, as per

WP:3RR. I understand that perhaps you meant to restore to an earlier version. To do that, please select "compare" in the page's history sections on the latest revision and the one you wish to revert to. But please be careful, you're reverting constructive edits to improper versions, do not revert indiscriminately. I'm assuming good faith here, but please do not start an edit war. Silvrous ^Talk 14:00, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --SMS ^Talk 17:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning re Optical Express

If you continue to make comments about other editors rather than improving the article you will be blocked from editing, you may not get another warning. MilborneOne (talk) 19:48, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.Hardlygone (talk) 00:25, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Optical Express COIN/Edit War Resolution

Please note that I have seen the RFC and COI requests for this article. I have proposed a resolution process that should work well for this article. Please see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#User:Golfbravoecho. I appreciate your involvement in making Wikipedia more accurate and appreciate your assistance in this process. Tiggerjay (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefintiely

I have indefinitely blocked your account as you appear to be here for the sole purpose of pursuing an agenda against Optical Express. Your edits have not been in keeping with the standard of conduct expected of an encyclopaedia editor, and you have violated informal agreements to discuss controversial edits on the talk page before making them. If you wish to appeal this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below this message and anther administrator will review it. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:48, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]