User talk:GonzoMex38

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, GonzoMex38, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions
. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page
, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 22:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Diego Orduña

The article Diego Orduña has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hasn't made a proffesional debut so it fails
WP:FOOTYN
.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

'nRed 08:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

August 2009

'nRed 17:44, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies
.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

talk) 23:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies
.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

'nRed 08:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Diego Orduña

An article that you have been involved in editing, Diego Orduña, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Orduña. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. GiantSnowman 10:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:CONCACAF Gold Cup/Championship top-scorers

'nRed 20:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Possibly unfree File:JaredBorgetti.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JaredBorgetti.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)(Talk) 21:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Monarcas Morelia.png)

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 03:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:EmanuelVilla.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EmanuelVilla.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:SantiagoSolariAtlante.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SantiagoSolariAtlante.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:EmanuelVilla.png

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:EmanuelVilla.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:EmanuelVilla.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:EmanuelVilla.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the

Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
(CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please do not upload images you find on the Web and falsely claim that they are your own work. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and if we cannot trust that you are contributing only your own creations, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:PueblaFC2009.png

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PueblaFC2009.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:RebocerosDeLaPiedad.png

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag
; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated,

talk) 01:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]