User talk:GothGrrrl

Welcome!

Hello, GothGrrrl, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

I'm afraid your suggestion, although creative, is highly unlikely to be approved. Protecting pages for an extended period of time is rarely done (there are only a couple examples) and in this case not warranted. The major issue with lists of crossover artists is verifying the accuracy or truth of such a list. The lists you created had no independent third party sources and therefore protecting such a list would be pointless unless multiple independent sources can be found.

talk) 21:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi GothGrrrl, welcome to Wikipedia. I've reverted your changes to Amy Lee, because the site you referenced was just a random person's blog, and does not count as a valid source (since it is not fact-checked, for one). Further, the area of the page where you found "mezzo-soprano" was a fairly old copy of the Wikipedia article that the blog-owner copied to his webpage. Anyhow, I just wanted to explain why I reverted. Cheers! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 23:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, unfortunately, I've again removed Mezzo-soprano from the article. Wikipedia doesn't accept blogs and other wiki (such as the site you referenced) as sources, because they, like Wikipedia, are written by non-experts...just normal folk like you and me. I'd suggest you check out

WP:SOURCES). If you have any questions, just leave a note on my talk page. Cheers! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 09:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

GothGrrrl, it is again reverted, as IMDB is also written by individuals. It is sort of like Wikipedia, except that submissions are moderated by people to make sure "trash" doesn't get in. As far as I'm aware, no fact-checking goes on. May I suggest, look for information in news articles, journals, similar type places (material written by respectable authors who fact-check their material). Instead of just submitting it, perhaps leave a message on my talk page with a link, and I'll let you know whether it is a reasonable source. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 02:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is unacceptable practice to remove sourced content because you "know" it isn't correct, or you think it isn't right. You must provide reliable 3rd party sourcing when making such changes, regardless of what you think or know. Changes such as these [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] removed cited material and may be considered vandalism. Also, adding such material, as you did here and here also require a citation from a reliable 3rd party source. Please either adhere to policy or stop making such changes. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refrain from adding these lists to articles. You keep getting reverted by me and others, per what is stated at

I'm sorry you've had a bad experience at it.wikipedia. However, the English Wikipedia is not your place to vent about it. Accordingly, I've removed your comment from Talk:Katy Perry. —C.Fred (talk) 20:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]