This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Do you think any of these "See also" links are worth keeping? I was asked to remove them during the GA review, but would appreciate a third opinion. Thanks! ---Another Believer(Talk) 21:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
I followed the back-and-forth in the GA review, and I was puzzled that the reviewer was so adamant about deleting the See also section. I'm wondering if the reviewer thought the list too politically-oriented, maybe part of the reviewer's NPOV perception, similar to the odd complaint on the Protests against Trump sidebar/footer issue. I personally like See also sections, but I don't know the etiquette of adding back at this point after passing GA. Maybe wait a bit, and add back gently, perhaps starting with
Thanks for all your help with 'Deana Haggag' and for teaching us about the copyright issues, etc. We're working hard to get more notable women curators on Wikipedia! Thank you again, and for editing so inclusively on this important platform! Notfacebook7 (talk) 00:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)