User talk:GreekGreenAnarchist100

Hello, GreekGreenAnarchist100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to

]

GreekGreenAnarchist100, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi GreekGreenAnarchist100! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Lightbreather (I'm a Teahouse host) talk) 16:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply ]

Misleading edit summaries

Writing "fixed spelling error" in the edit summary field when in fact you are doing something else is not on. Mezigue (talk) 11:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the same vein, changes to content are not minor, and should not be marked as such. A minor change would be to correct a spelling mistake, to alter the presentation or formatting in some small way so that it conforms with one of our guidelines, or similar (see

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Jonathanarpith (talk) 14:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's an "Insufficient edit"? Please read

Please see a notice of our policy on edit warring at {{uw-3rr}}. If you are unhappy with the current state of the article, you are welcome to explain your concerns at Talk:Polish People's Republic. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that difficult to archive, why are you insistent on not providing new archive links for references you insert? Serious question. -- The Writer 2.0 ^Talk 22:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. RGloucester — ☎ 14:33, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GreekGreenAnarchist100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I demand an immediate end to the sock puppet investigation on the account Jets100. I am asking for the deletion of all the accounts associated with Jets100.

Decline reason:

Is that an admission that you are a sock puppet? PhilKnight (talk) 15:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GreekGreenAnarchist100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will not admit to sock puppetry but I do demand the deletion of all the accounts associated with Jets100. Please and Thank You.

Decline reason:

The block is imposed for sockpuppetry. and this is the issue you must address. Accounts cannot be deleted, and even if they could you have no authority to request, never mind demand, such deletion. --

^"talk" 19:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.