User talk:Groundswell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Groundswell, and

welcome
to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --Lukobe 06:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Your pictures of LaPush and Dungeness

Thanks for uploading. A couple of things: 1) When you post them to the articles, could you please set the picture size? Otherwise they are displayed at full size. I've fixed the above-mentioned articles, but if you could do this in future that'd be great. 2) Also, would it be possible to upload your photos without the watermarks? I don't know if there's a specific policy against that, but I do know that it's preferred that pictures do not include watermarks if possible. Thanks! --Lukobe 06:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of DaveManning

CSD g12
.

Under the

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon
}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. --Bencomplain 06:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DaveManning

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that

talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Postoak 06:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Copyright

Hello. To confirm that you are the copyright holder, please send an email to [email protected] with this text:

I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of [link to the webpage from which you took the text].

I agree to publish that work under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

DATE, NAME OF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER

Please also mention the name of the article, which is currently Dave Manning (musician), in the email. Mushroom (Talk) 07:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tag removal and CopyVio

_ _ Your removal of the "advertising" tag from Dave Manning (musician), without comment, and when no change has arguably alleviated the problem, is fully as problematic as simple vandalism, and repetition will not be tolerated. If you have not consulted the notice on talk:Dave Manning (musician), do so, and take the steps necessary to license the content under GDFL. If you have already done so, you should request via the same (sending and receiving) EMail addresses that a WP administrator confirm your compliance on that talk page. Failing that, expect me, before long, to review the evidence of copyright violation to determine whether the page is subject to speedy deletion, and if so, to delete it without further notice.
_ _ Do not remove the CopyVio tag again without verifying that the required evidence appears on the article's talk page.
--Jerzyt 22:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Email small jpeg.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Email small jpeg.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DAVE.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

talk 19:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Possibly unfree Image:LoLoPeak2007.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

File permission problem with File:Mayor-John-Engen.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mayor-John-Engen.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the
    this list
    ) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
    here
    .

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Sentinel logo.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading

image description page
.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Admrboltz (talk) 21:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sentinel logo.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sentinel logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the
    this list
    ) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
    here
    .

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:15, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Dungeness.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Dungeness.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Dungeness.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Dungeness.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the

Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
(CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Legohead1 (talk) 16:54, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on your article

Hello, Groundswell. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2010_July_4#http:.2F.2Fen.wikipedia.org.2Fwiki.2FSnowglobe_.28band.29.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hey there! Left some feedback for you and also removed the userdraft template from your article. Take care :) Pianotech (talk) 17:19, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mayor-John-Engen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mayor-John-Engen.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

permitted conditions
then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant
    copyright tag
    .

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Acather96 (talk) 07:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:DSC00599.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC00599.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Acather96 (talk) 19:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Email small jpeg.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Email small jpeg.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:19, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]