User talk:GroupCohomologist

Welcome!

Hello, GroupCohomologist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started

Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to

talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk 23:56, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Teahouse

Your question at the Teahouse has been answered!

Neigh) 21:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

The other Peter Ball

The other Peter Ball is this chap, also here, and here. DuncanHill (talk) 23:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! GroupCohomologist (talk) 23:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - I'd previously wrongly identified him with the bishop on another website (I've now corrected that), and when I saw the removal of books here, and read the comment at the BLP noticeboard I thought I should double check, turned up those links and thought you might appreciate them. DuncanHill (talk) 23:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Looking at the revision history of Otto Scharmer I couldn't help noticing two historic cases of declared COI editing (June 2015 and October 2012). Does something need to be done, or am I getting worked up about nothing?

GroupCohomologist (talk) 13:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My advice would be to check the article itself: Does it seem unsuitably promotional? Is it heavily based on primary sources, or largely unreferenced? Of course you can also check the page history and look up the specific changes introduced by those editors. COI editing on its own is not prohibited, and those who declare it tend to be less of a problem than those who don't. So if the content is OK, nothing needs to be done. Huon (talk) 14:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CC

See Talk:Confessing_Church#When_did_the_CC_cease_to_exist.3F

Jcwf (talk) 02:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]