User talk:Gut Monk

This is an excellent picture (much appreciated!), but from the pattern of the plumage I strongly suspect this is a fledgling

Good eye! That is exactly what it is. Feel free to rename and move it. Gut Monk (talk) 20:29, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Thank you for submitting a nomination to

Why support female intellectualism and not intellectualism in general? Well, you make a good point and I kind-of support intellectualism in general, but I think that (more often than guys) usually girls' level of success is throttled by attractiveness. So I support female intellectualism to help drive out that inequality in our current society. Really, society will get way more fun when smart girls are desired as much as pretty girls. Gut Monk (talk) 20:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's very interesting, thank you. I see some flaws in your reasoning/thinking/approach, but overall it's a positive point of view. I won't criticise or comment on your belief system further than that, I won't be rude, but thank you very much for sharing! Makes a change for a male to even realise that girls have brains, nonetheless champion their intellectualism, :)

talk 21:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

I can feel the flaws myself. I'm a better conversationalist than a writer. If you would like to share them, I'd be delighted to hear them. Gut Monk (talk) 21:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I am a better writer than conversationalist! But sure, we can talk about it, that would be cool. You can email me with your chat/voice client preference if you'd like. (P.S. Sorry for the reply delay, the sun goes down here first.)

talk 05:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Hey; this, combined with my reaction to your last nomination, may make me look like a really unpleasant person. I hope you don't take it personally- honestly, I'm glad to have someone new around FPC! The majority of my nominations fail as well; it's just a matter of getting used to what works and what doesn't, in a way. Feel free to drop a line on my talk page if I can help with anything. J Milburn (talk) 10:10, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page has more details. J Milburn (talk) 20:55, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Remember that it has to be released under a free license, not just for use on Wikipedia. CC by SA 3.0 is the one we usually recommend. Also, remember to submit the email confirming permission to [email protected]. Feel free to contact me and I'll deal with the email immediately, rather than waiting for someone to get to it. J Milburn (talk) 22:56, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please expand on your reasoning here? We frequently promote images that illustrate only the respective genus article, as there is not yet an article on the species (or the precise species cannot be identified). I can't see what EV problem there is. J Milburn (talk) 21:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks. I actually just use the

Why are you changing other people's text messages? It's an actual warnable offense. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 02:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• • Why was my car's rear door open this morning? Honest to goodness, a case of sleep walking (or computing.) Gut Monk (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a great photo. Any luck? Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 23:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk 23:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

Thanks for the encouragement. You might want to look at some of the

Hello, Gut Monk. You have new messages at Makeemlighter's talk page.
Message added 00:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Given your reluctant oppose at

This is not already a FP, and this is not how you close a FPC. You've probably ruined its chances now; it won't receive the necessary attention. I've reverted your edits. J Milburn (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I was a little snappy. Thanks for the support. J Milburn (talk) 22:32, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rhino hide: good for fly repulsion and Wikipedia assaults since 1909. Gut Monk (talk) 22:34, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted to a version which I believe was based on the blocks alone. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 03:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gut Monk. You have new messages at P. S. Burton's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

P. S. Burton (talk) 16:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Given all the discussion at

I noticed this edit. Can you tell me what proper procedure is for resuming a nomination that has been suspended?--

Why does it violate protocol and what is proper procedure for resuming a suspended nomination?--

WP:FOUR) 20:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

I think you asked about making a subsection for zugzwang in game theory. This was discussed a year or two ago. All we had on zugzwang in game theory was that one paragraph (which is in the introduction), so we decided to not make it a subsection. If it could be expanded, then it could be a subsection or even its own article, say zugzwang (game theory). Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture

so i'm working on coding a prog that display fractal in c and i also want a tatoo. i'm therefore asking you the permition to use the representqtion of "a fractal flame" as a tat and also as a adition to my project but for both i might need a litle bit of enlightment about the math behind it, so if you could provide me with some mathematical representation of it, i would be honored. 2A01:E0A:4BE:3310:7951:5470:773F:D075 (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you can send stuff to [email protected] 2A01:E0A:4BE:3310:7951:5470:773F:D075 (talk) 23:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]