User talk:Hamid-Masri

Welcome!

Hello, Hamid-Masri, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Jaha, är du också dansk? Jag bor i Sverige. Hur länge har du bott i Danmark? Ma salam :) --Striver - talk 18:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nej, jag är född i Mellanöstern och har bott i Sverige i snart 17 år :) --Striver - talk 08:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jag kan språket... halet khobe`? --Striver - talk 12:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, inshalla shoma'am khobin :) Well, i try to not say to much on the internet, otherwise i would say were i live. I hope you don't get offended :) --Striver - talk 12:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Självklart broder, det är bara att fråga när du vill, och om jag kan så ska jag inshalla svara :) --Striver - talk 12:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a friendly note regarding the use of {{

Salam, and thanks for the message. I have not looked to deeply into it, but it looks good and neutral, good job. --Striver - talk 11:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i expanded many of the Sunni books, but never got around to create Shi'a, so im glad that somebody is doing that. Your spelling seems right according to google, al-Islam.org uses that.

By the way, have you seen Terrorstorm?

Ma salam and thanks for the cooperative spirit :) --Striver - talk 12:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! --Striver - talk 13:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, be proud over your actions, don't let it depend on me :) Ma salam. --Striver - talk 17:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salam. Thanks for the message, i have responded on Talk:Hadith of Mut'ah and Imran ibn Husain. Peace. --Striver - talk 13:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have commented on the talk page. --Striver - talk 15:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Klaksonn removed your edits regarding Fatimah's death. I personally have no inclination to get into another argument with him, but I just wanted to let you know in case you want to do anything about it.--Slacker 15:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salam brother. I have responded on Talk:Hadith of Sabra reporting on the prohibition of Mut'ah. --Striver - talk 09:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hamid-Masri. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under

Hello Hamid, would you be willing to take up this task on the article "Arab Christians"? A certain user insists on inserting this statement regarding jizya: "Those who couldn't afford it were left with two options: either convert to the new-comer religion, or face execution--according to the Shar'iah law." The user later added three sources, two of which are of questionable validity due to their partisan and sectarian nature, and in any case do not say that "those who couldn't afford" were subject to exeuction. The third source does state that, but offers no citation. Can you please show that this is not the case? You can use sources from the article "jizya" that speak of exemptions for the poor, the elderly, and the like. I would do so myself, but I'll be travelling soon and won't be able to follow up on it. Let me know what you think. Thanks. Slacker 04:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invitation to participate in the discussion about the hadith of Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya. I looked at the article, and I do not feel that I can help you much. I can easily copyedit English text, but comparing it against the Arabic original would take me too much time.

I don't understand why there are so many alternate versions of the story - with and without the two cloaks. Maybe this is a characteristic of all the hadith. If so, there should be a consensus among concerned users how this should be handled. All similar articles should be handled the same way.

Good luck. Cbdorsett 09:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you check one small word change in an article you started? As mentioned in my change comments, I think that the one place that the word 'Jurisprudent' was used it should have been 'Jurisprudence'.

But since the text says

The literal translation of the title Man la yahduruhu al-Faqih is For him not in the Presence of Jurisprudent.

I didn't want to change the translation/quote, since as I don't know Arabic it wouldn't be right for me to just change it. The word 'Jurisprudence' _is_ used later in the text....

Thanks. Shenme (talk) 09:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You saw it, I advise you to see the end —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.76.66.69 (talk) 16:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current