Hello, I'm TheOldJacobite. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Batman (1989 film) that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '45 16:00, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What you're editing are Good Articles, and your additions are not deemed helpful by other editors. You may discuss such matters on the talk page, but it is rarely a good idea to go against consensus. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an
try to reach a consensus
rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Drmies (talk) 16:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Consider this a warning:
incivility ([3]) are not tolerated. If you continue to adit in this manner, whether you cease edit warring or not, you can be blocked from editing. - J Greb (talk) 23:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
And now you are being willfully
secondary
source, and preferable a third party one is needed to support that information.
If you continue to disrupt the article, re-add that information without an appropriate source, or engage in disruptive actions based on what you want in the article, you will be temporarily
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:J Greb with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you, MadGuy7023 (talk) 17:51, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
January 2013
your pet theory
.
What you did is a
content fork
. Please refrain from doing this again.
Similarly, please do not revert redirects to plot only, fanservice character articles and you did here.
And while were at it:
Changes like this need to be explained. Where is that name used? Is it how the character commonly identified?
Removing matenace tags, as you did here, without actually addressing the issue is incorrect. Once or twice is disruptive, continuing to do this can be seen as
vandalism
.
Common words and phrases generally should not be linked as you did here. Please read
WP:OVERLINK
And you are going to need to show a consensus to get this change.
Blocked permanently for a death threat (and a threat of sockpuppetry). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Sorry for threat JGreb but are watching his editions, this guy is making my life impossible here in wikipedia and not allow me to contribute to it. Although my unlocking is not for tomorrow yet I ask that this person be investigated for his constant abuse. I know this does not presume in good faith but not the presumed JGreb for his constant attacks on my person. Sorry if I had to get death threats and was told that in a moment of anger, but this person can not do what he pleases in wikipedia and even being administrator must set a good example. And I will not create sockpuppets (what a lie) and if they do other users and even administrators, only emergency I can create another user without having to do more.
Decline reason:
No. Wikipedia is a collaborative, consensus editing environment; users who make death threats against other users are utterly unwelcome. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I was angry, I'm sorry. Why don't give me a second chance?. Jpgordon please be reasonable and the other decent administrators; J Greb is a worse user than me but that's not justify my actions with him, so I'm sorry for this. Give a secind chance and I swear don't not therat J Greb and/or other administrator but please review the actions of J Greb.
Decline reason:
No. You still claim that you were reasonable and J. Greb was not. First of all, J. Greb's actions and comments are above the board here. Second, even if they weren't, there is no excuse for what you said (I'm shocked that someone would talk like that). This is not a game. This is not some forum where teenagers can go around calling each other names. You have a lot of growing up to do before you can write an unblock request that an admin here will accept; obviously this one is not going to be granted. Drmies (talk) 03:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is a clear history of anger management issues here. If you've chosen to escalate to specific threats of bodily harm, you are indeed utterly unwelcome to contribute. At that, I don't see any reason to continue to allow you to post passive-aggressive unblock requests; please use
Hello, I'm TheOldJacobite. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Batman (1989 film) that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '45 16:00, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
disruptive editing, as you did at Mastermind (Jason Wyngarde). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text]
