User talk:History quester

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Panarwa thikana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Melecie. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gurjar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 💜  melecie  talk - 13:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Share your email, have something important to share you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by बाबू साहेब (talk • contribs) 02:15, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Packer&Tracker: The controversy around Rajput origin is a complex one, but there is no controversy about them being rajput. The main controversy about Gurjara-Pratihara is about the word Gurjara, some historians suggest it was a region, some suggest it was a tribe. But no historian says they weren't a rajput dynasty. Likewise many different Rajput dynasties have different origin theories, almost all rajput clans have been given different origin theories by different historians, but them being rajput is not in question. The changes done by History quester seems okay, also it is backed by reliable sources. Sajaypal007 (talk) 19:06, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not quite sure why you think the identity of Pratihars is a controversial edit, since some references used here are already used multiple times on this page about Gurjar-Pratihars, and it clearly says they were a Rajput dynasty. One cannot selectively choose from the same sources. Other sources which I have used are

WP:RS as well.History quester (talk) 02:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@Sajaypal007: I am not talking about Rajput origin here. I just think that mentioning them as Rajputs will be bit contentious unlike other Rajput dynasties i.e. Chauhans (Sambhar, Jalore, Nadol), Solankis of Gujarat, Parmaras of Dhar, Guhila-Sisodias of Mewar, Rathores, Chandelas, Kachwahas of Dhundar etc.

@History quester: Please see their origin section regarding their contentious nature as Rajputs, although it's true that modern researches dismissed the dated colonial myth of them being Gurjars (Dashratha Sharma and all) but still some scholars like R.C Majumdar in modern times do assert that their early rulers were assosiated with Gurjar tribe. Packer&Tracker (talk) 10:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Packer&Tracker: How will that be contentious, the origin problem is a separate one and unrelated to this. Anyone proposing or supporting Gurjara origin also mentions the dynasty as rajput, this isn't mutually exclusive, RC Majumdar also call it Rajput dynasty. You are confusing two separate topics. Sajaypal007 (talk) 11:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Argument of supporters of Gurjara origin theory is this: that this Rajput dynasty originated from an unknown Gurjara tribe, they are not saying Pratiharas were from modern Gurjar caste. Either supporter or those against this theory both, no group says they are not a rajput dynasty. I believe this will remove your confusion. Sajaypal007 (talk) 11:14, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not only that the Gurjara origin myth was mixed packet of colonial history which connected every indian power to have some outside connection thats why Aryan Invasion theory was also a colonial concept. This was more due to them (British) being foreigners, hence justifying their rule saying most of the indian powers were actually foreigner hence the Gurjara theory was also given in the same tone as some foreigner tribe coming to india and ruling it. Sajaypal007 (talk) 11:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, History quester

Thank you for creating

Hello! Do you intend to have without space like

SardarSamand instead of with space like Sardar Samand

? Most sources I see is using spaces.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

ShriBalajji (talk) 04:13, 18 May 2023 (UTC) please do not remove or revert changes made according to the reliable sources and Targeted Pages as your revision has so many errors your changes will not appear your revision have so many error like Gujar but the Target Page Is Gurjar an ethnicity and some other errors too so don't revert without explaining in summaries or providing reliable sources as your actions too reflect the vandalism and Disruptive editing thank you.[reply]

I have not made any recent changes in Gurjar page, but have reverted the vandalism and changes on Landhaura page where Gujar was replaced as Gurjars, which is not as per the references used. So if you have any references with respect to Landhaura related to those details, do add it instead of just changing to Gurjar which is not correct and does not reflect the references used. Please do not make changes without any proper references. Please refer the wiki references guidelines. Thanks. History quester (talk) 13:23, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that you made en edit on Vijay Singh Gurjar without any source So what source you have can you share with me I can see your just on Wikipedia to Target Gurjars what's wrong with you editing pages can't Change the truth @History quester History.With.Facts (talk) 01:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• None of the source mentioned on the page has the title as "First war of Independence". So it's clearly incorrect to add such a section on the page.
• None of the sources mention them as Gurjar, it's Goojur or Gujar. Any detail on the page should be as per references, not as per any personal liking / preference.
• I would advise you to go through wiki guidelines of reliable sources and references.

Please avoid making unreferenced changes and accusing other editors. History quester (talk) 12:11, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lol Britishers mentioned as Gurjar I have added source and what is your source a second class writer which book was written 2-3 years ago

What is difference between Gurjar or Gurjar ?? Britisers mentioned Dehradun as Dehra Doon So it's Different? They mentioned Rajput as Rajpoots so it's different? Doesn't have any logic i can guess you're a Randput

I Advise you to Go through wiki guidelines and as per Offical records Wikipedia editing can't change truth your on Wikipedia because your obsessed with Gurjars.lol History.With.Facts (talk) 14:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Bandanwara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Bandanwara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Imperial^[AFCND] 08:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]