User talk:Hnedrfrieowjiahfguh

You are contributing to the education of the masses. ;) I know it can be frustrating to have your edits undone or changed, but it happens to everyone. You're doing a good job with the edits to Scientific notation and the redirect of Normalised notation, so don't get discouraged.

If you ever need anything, let me know or ask at the

Steven Walling • talk 01:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For reverting vandalism at Feminism. I note you aren't a frequent editor and that you contributions, although small, are very much appreciated. Tutelary (talk) 02:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks for the thanks.

talk) 02:18, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Seems like a close relative of the ceiling cat.

Kosterortiizbrock (talk) 05:55, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to

@

talk) 15:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

This is just silly, please stop. Fyddlestix (talk) 04:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As the name says, it's definitely not me.

talk) 13:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

In all honesty, the whole thing was not even vaguely amusing to start with. I'd also strongly suggest that you don't try to

using your judgement wisely henceforth... seriously. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keegscee. That was not FuzzyCatPotato. Sro23 (talk) 03:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will point out that the troll is from the same site as FuzzyCatPotato, though he hasn't been active there in years. To clarify, he was a respected member there in good standing, not a "wandal" as they call it. When he was community banned here, the other members there all stood by his side, saying that his ban wasn't fair, and saying derogatory things about me and other Wikipedians. This troll from his site must make FuzzyCatPotato proud of his mothership. Beyond that, congratulations to the troll for creating drama. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 12:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will also point out that the aforementioned troll left the site long before FCP joined. You're blatantly attempting to poison the well here, PCHS. RoninMacbeth (talk) 05:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Vaginal steaming. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fuzzy, this has been discussed before. Don't add links to Rational-Wiki, or other places where you would have a conflict of interest without a good reason (like on the site's own article), doing so is spam. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 03:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Spamming". I am shaking in my boots. Your

talk) 14:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

I remove the links to protect the integrity of the encyclopedia, and because community consensus supports my position on the matter per

WP:COI. I don't believe you are here in bad faith, but if you wish to improve the encyclopedia, you need to follow the guidelines and respect community consensus or the community will have to take steps to stop you from disrupting (blocking, topic bans, etc), and nobody wants to have to escalate to that. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 03:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

If there's one thing Wikipedia needs, it's Conservapedia editors demanding "respect". Consider my thumb bitten.

talk) 06:01, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

I take that as a

build an encyclopedia. You are more than welcome to be part of this community, but when I edit Wikipedia, I do so with Wikipedia's policies and best interest in mind, and I suggest you either do the same or stick to your own wiki. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 11:34, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:ArbCom has suggested suppression of such posts (and I'm debating in my head whether I want to trouble an oversighter to suppress it or not). This is not Rational-Wiki, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies if you wish to be a part of our community. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 02:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Furthermore, I am going to ask you, if you are not here to promote Rational-Wiki, why are most of your edits related to Rational-Wiki, including to add links to its articles? If you are here to build an encyclopedia, why not just create quality content in our articles instead of linking to Rational-Wiki? I think your actions are disruptive, and I have been kind not to take this to

WP:ANI, or some other drama board, but if you continue acting like this, I'm not going to have a choice. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 02:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 01:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The

discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here

.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 05:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:RationalWiki Main Page Screenshot 10 February 2015.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:RationalWiki Main Page.png. "Filemover" declined rename request because they believed the date was an integral part of the filename. This is obviously nonsense which could result in countless redundant files - lots of files get updated on a regular basis and a date in the filename becomes confusing/unworkable/redundant. Anyway, this file is no longer useful.

Begoon 08:49, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Nothing to worry about - damn these auto-generated templates to hell - just superseded by c:File:RationalWiki_Main_Page.png is all. Cheers.-- Begoon 09:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 22:31, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Holodomor into Holodomor in modern politics. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@

talk) 14:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]