User talk:Holmanc

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Paste (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just left you a note on Talk:Cal Holman. Big improvement on the article! Nice work. Toddst1 (talk) 14:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:50th portrat cal holman.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

He might pass

WP:TNT

and a complete re-write in neutral tone, it reads like it was written by a close relative.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Bud Holman
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Holmanc! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Bud Holman. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 00:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hoary - thanks for the input. What is the best way to communicate with the reviewers - i.e. ask clarifying questions or provide context? Cal Holman (talk) 16:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Bud Holman. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 22:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Bud Holman
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Bud Holman. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 00:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Bud Holman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the assistance Cal Holman (talk) 20:51, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong - What about the warning on the page that it was written by me and I am too close to the subject? Also is it protocol to leave all the discussion on the talk page? Again thank you for your help. Cal Holman (talk) 20:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]