User talk:Hong12kong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

helpme
}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on

sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! EWikistTalk 02:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Greetings from Hong Kong! Learning the ropes, doing a little RC Patrol ... Hong12kong (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo
Hello! Hong12kong, you are invited to the
Sarah (talk) 20:17, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Teahouse Q&A board
. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ryan Vesey Review me! 22:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at

Questions or Guests
pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:31, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

talk) 09:00, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Excuse confusion, that talk page should no longer redirect. Removed redirect code, and replaced with project disambiguation template. Hong12kong (talk) 10:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Masculinism

Wikipedia doesn't like

WP:EDITWAR and since you have been revert by several editors, you need to stop reverting against multiple editors and go to the talkpage to discuss your edits. Also, have you read the article cited? Are you sure that you are correct in your facts? Because this summary of the research suggests that your reverts are in fact incorrect, and that preschool boys are given more freedom in the classroom with regard to noise, activity, Unless you have some other evidence to counter I would suggest that you revert your edit.Slp1 (talk) 01:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

I see that you had already started discussing on the talkpage while I was posting this. So, you can ignore that part of the message. But you still likely need to revert back, since based on the article and the summary I point to, the original version was actually correct. Note that the section is in the "criticism" section --Slp1 (talk) 01:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Yes, Kevin Gorman already reverted the passage back--but note that "the original version" was the one I was reverting to, in the (mistaken) belief that it was correct! As I explained on the Masculism talk page, I was defending the coherence of the WP article, but without actually reading the source. Once I read the source, I realized that the original version was wrong--wrong, that is, as a paraphrase of the source--and I was wrong to defend it. If the source is accurately paraphrased, then the entire paragraph becomes inappropriate for the Masculism entry, and should be cut. Hong12kong (talk) 08:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this and your other note. Just to clarify one thing. If you check the history, you'll see that the longstanding "original (and accurate) version" is what it says now. It was changed by an IP yesterday [1], and you twice reverted back to this incorrect formulation.
The whole thing is a good example of the need to check the sources before restoring information, even what seems like vandalism at times. Editors are held responsible the content of their edits even when they are reverting others. Please don't worry about though; it is an easy mistake to make fairly early in one's wiki career!! Slp1 (talk) 12:13, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay thanks! (I could have sworn I'd seen the paragraph the way I was reverting it back to, a week or two ago, when I was first working on the page ...) Hong12kong (talk)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, Hong12kong. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hong12kong. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hong12kong. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 22:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 11:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]