User talk:Hoverflew0909
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Hoverflew0909, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- Article Wizardif you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
maclean (talk) 01:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Tagged Something
{{
- If it is a talkpage, you can just remove the material and cite WP:copyvioas the reasoning.
- Warm regards, JaakobouChalk Talk 12:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: User:!Lee!
Hello Hoverflew0909, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of
And Another Tag
{{
- There is no speedy deletion tag there. You can remove the cleanup tag if you want. Just leave a note in the edit summary explaining why. BejinhanTalk 13:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- (e/c) You are allowed to remove a speedy deletion tag when you understand the issue and find that it is blatantly incorrect. Here I do not think you understood the issue. The tagging was as a copyright violation. The notability of the subject has no bearing whatever on that issue. The most notable subject in the world should be deleted if it is a copyright violation. In fact, you could argue that the more notable the topic, the more crucial it is that we delete the article on it quickly if it is a copyright violation because the more notable, the more likely it is that it will be visited, thus exposing Wikipedia to potential liability for hosting the copyright infringing content. In any event, I have declined the speedy because checking the page that it was stated as a copyright violation of, I couldn't find any verbatim copying of text, so I don't know what the tagger meant when they marked it as infringing that source. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:00, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Hoverflew0909
The article Muhammad and assinations has been proposed for deletion.
A lot of the references and section of data have been remved by people who do not like criticism of islam.and they
U rejected deletion originally.go here if you still have the same views regarding deletion. if you want it to be deleted then say so.
Also anyone who accuses me of canvassing, then let it be known that this user hoverflw sent me a message to reply to him.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Muhammad_and_assassinations --Misconceptions2 (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Katrina parker
The article
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
- I have added a reliable source and deleted the said tag. Thank you for the notice. --Hoverflew0909 (talk) 10:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)