User talk:HtownCat

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on

ϢereSpielChequers 22:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!HtownCat (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! HtownCat, you are invited to the Sarah (talk) 03:48, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi. When you recently edited Craig Keeland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Highland Park High School and Central Market (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For writing IntelliServ :). Ironholds (talk) 19:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My first Barnstar! I am very excited--thanks!HtownCat (talk) 19:50, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :). Ironholds (talk) 19:58, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I like the work you've done on

Thank you. I responded on the Talk page of the article.HtownCat (talk) 16:42, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on our earlier conversation, I am glad we were able to come to some agreement about the way forward. But I should make clear that I do not think that the article is a suitable stand alone article as it currently stands. Unless it is changed in line with our conversation I think we should merge it with Generation Z. Since I'm still not sold on the idea that it should be stand alone at this point, I will leave that work to you, but I will not wait forever without beginning a formal merge procedure. Please let me know if you have any concerns. Best, Peregrine981 (talk) 10:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I've taken too long. I got through some of the changes today and will continue. Thanks, HtownCat (talk) 23:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Frank L. VanderSloot". Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 04:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sean Roden, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Midland High School, Museum of Western Art and Josef Schmid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To respond to your query, I think the tag itself gives an explanation of what needs to be done. The sources indicate that this is a marketing concept, and no reliable sources I have seen indicate that it is the widely accepted term for this generation of people. The article should be adjusted to reflect that it's a marketing idea or a proposed name for the generation; it might be better to merge it, though, since it doesn't seem to have gained much traction on its own. --Batard0 (talk) 03:48, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has been opened at Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Frank_L._VanderSloot, where all discussion should take place.

The questions are:

1. Based on the claim of Synthesis, should the original version or the revised version of the LGBT Section be used in the article from henceforth—of course with the ability to edit it as necessary?
2. Because the original "LGBT issues" Section adversely comments on a Living Person, should that section be immediately replaced with the revised section—of course with the ability to edit it as necessary?
3. Should the Sources identified as faulty or not germane be eliminated from the list of References?
   
   talk) 00:30, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
   ]

]

The happiness of this season to you

	Winter solstice 2012–2013
	- talk) 19:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply ]

Thanks, GeorgeLouis! Back at ya! HtownCat (talk) 13:30, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Ketan Rahangdale, HtownCat!

Wikipedia editor Dictioneer just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Well-sourced article about a living person (always tricky). Just a note, you were using an obsolete category (American Enterpreneurs has be replaced by American Businesspeople) which I took the liberty of correcting.

To reply, leave a comment on Dictioneer's talk page.

Learn more about

You added a synthesis to an article in one of your edits. For that synthesis you used a journal known for publishing pseudoscience. See

As reviewing administrator, I decided not to delete it, but it will almost certainly be soon nominated for deletion. Theo nly thing that will really help much is additional good references. Of those you have, the first seems a good source, though Washington Business has sometimes been viewed here as very willing to publish press releases. The 2nd and 3rd are meme mentions. The 4th seems a press release--I'm not clear of the identity of the source. If you can add anything , do it promptly. DGG ( talk ) 22:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll work on it. Thanks for your feedback and help. HtownCat (talk) 19:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craig Keeland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Keeland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, there are many badly sourced and promotional company articles that need help. Generally, anything unsourced can be deleted at any time. Another thing to do is at least list things as a list in a prose sentence instead of bullets. What I find works is to see if there are any really notable and sourced partnerships and add prose of the form:

In January 2008 PerspecSys announced that [[Big Company]] agreed to but $3 billion of its products.<ref>{{Cite source}}</ref>

There might not be any such deals that were notable enough for some independent source (like the trade press at least) to write about it. Not sure, would take some searching. Generally everything should be dated and sourced. Thanks for any work on these. W Nowicki (talk) 00:24, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 21:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ross Mintzer may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |Lost in America<ref>[http://testicanzoni.mtv.it/testi-The-Ross-Mintzer-Band_24824218 "MTV Italy."</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

talk) 16:17, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olivia Marie Braida-Chiusano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hooker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sample of Ross Mintzer's "Guayaquil".ogg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AdemcoLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ron Kaufman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron Kaufman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Kaufman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EarTop Technologies logo.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of KI Solutions.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zevia logo.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Zevia logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]