User talk:Humok

Thanks for your contributions to Lex Sacrata. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ASUKITE 15:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Lex Icilia. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Theres no reason to list nationality, as the guideline clearly states. If she was born somewhere else, had a parent from somewhere else, represented multiple countries, anything... I could see it. Nswix (talk) 05:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss on the article talk page please. Humok (talk) 05:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, literally the first driver I looked up, Daniel Ricciardo doesn't have his nationality listed. Nswix (talk) 05:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's because you removed it yourself back in July.... Humok (talk) 05:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Tarleton Cap did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! -

Hello Humok (talk · contribs). I noticed several problems with the article ‘Tarleton cap’ which you created.

It appears to have been put together from three or four copied segments. Unfortunately, they haven’t been integrated sufficiently. There are run-on sentences, and quite a few grammatical and spelling/typographical errors. Some factual inaccuracies have been carried over without checking. There are also references to non-existent illustrations, and citations which don’t work. Two points of detail subsequently added by an anonymous user ought to be verified in a second source.

You haven’t edited the article since the day you created it. I wasn’t comfortable adding numerous flags or posting questions on the article’s talk page. As a courtesy, I am posting to your personal talk page. Will you be attending to some of these problems in the next week? Humphrey Tribble (talk) 06:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have just seen this. I will reply on the talk page. Humok (talk) 06:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tarleton Cap, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a