User talk:Hunc
Hunc, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Hunc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) |
AfD Listing process
Continuing the discussion here, as a lost AfD page isn't really the place for it. The full process is at
Anthony Bailey
I see are you are continuing to vandalise the above article which I've been amending. I believe the reasons I have amended some of your text is clear for all to see. please can you explain to me which parts of my amendments you are objecting to and why. 2001:8A0:7BDD:FA01:DA9:A4FF:AEED:46A6 (talk) 20:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
The AfD for Surval Montreux has been fixed and now can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surval Montreux. I didn't copy over your comments from Talk:Surval Montreux to there, but you should feel free to do so if you want to. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:50, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Princess Camilla
Please do not continue to blank this page and change it to a redirect (as you did here: [1], [2]) without obtaining
- This is best discussed at the talk page, which at the moment consists mostly of longstanding calls for the article to be changed to a redirect. I look forward to your comments there. Hunc (talk) 16:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Princess Maria Carolina of Bourbon
I think perhaps this page (
- I think you're right. The SPA Borbone2016 has edited nowhere else, and I strongly suspect more CoI editing. Some of the IP additions also look ducky. I've made a brief comment on the talk page. Hunc (talk) 06:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Page creator here. Please see my comment in the talk section regarding the speedy deletion. I'm sorry that bots have been editing my page. How is it self-promotion though? That's one thing I don't understand.
--PrincessAlice13 (talk) 13:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
What happened here? "removed material with no or inappropriate references", you literally left the page with a one sentence lede and no references. I'd hazard a guess that you haven't seen
- Removed material with inappropriate references - I did take the time to read them. Let us continue this discussion on the appropriate talk page. Hunc (talk) 21:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Hunc. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in
For additional information, please see the
Doug Weller talk 14:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Darul Huda Islamic University
"................. However the UGC, India's only official body with the power to accredit universities, does not list it as a university.. It offers both undergraduate and postgraduate programs."
Since,
- We make no assertion about whether Darul Huda Islamic Academy needs accreditation from the University Grants Commission (India). We just point out that it doesn't have it. Hunc (talk) 19:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)]
Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review