User talk:I dream of horses/2021/January

Thank you for approving this article. It is encouraging to have my first created article published, and also to get such a swift response at this time of year. Happy New Year. Verbarson (talk) 14:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for guidance to re-submit the follow page. I removed the pictures for the time being while I work to resolve the copyright issues. I did apply suggested edits by a previous review. Thanks and Happy New Year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgambesc (talk • contribs) 19:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 23:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Why is this on my talk page? I have nothing to do with this submission. Please be advised to delete any connection you've made between me and this article you've rejected or any article I have submitted. Thank you, ConnieinChicago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConnieinChicago (talk • contribs) 20:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 23:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Looking for guidance to re-submit the follow page. I removed the pictures for the time being while I work to resolve the copyright issues. I did apply suggested edits by a previous review. Thanks and Happy New Year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgambesc (talk • contribs) 19:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 23:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Why is this on my talk page? I have nothing to do with this submission. Please be advised to delete any connection you've made between me and this article you've rejected or any article I have submitted. Thank you, ConnieinChicago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConnieinChicago (talk • contribs) 20:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 23:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Obviously I am very new to Wiki publishing. Sorry for all the back and forth. Based on the help page you have rejected as it is not "notable" for Wiki. Can you please explain the definition of "notable". This page was created to link to other pages where Dr Gambescia is referenced (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin_Research_Project). Dr Gambescia was also notable citizen of Philadelphia were he will also be referenced. There are also several notable sources that referece Dr Gambescia's work. This include mainly articals in the Philadelphia Inquirer (some are sited) and scientific journals (some are sited). FYI: Stephen F. Gambescia--Tgambesc (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)I dream of horses — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgambesc (talk • contribs) 14:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 05:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@

notify

me if you post on your own talk page.

Thank you I dream of horses for the ping. Fiddle Faddle 10:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have left some heavyweight advice for this editor on my own talk page. Fiddle Faddle 22:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kavita_Joshi have significant coverage in multiple news channels after playing as Sita in Ayodhya ki Ramleela which was broadcast live on DD National & DD Bharti. if you have any question about the person notability. lets me know

Rajlaxmi2 (talk) 07:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC) Hi, User:I dream of horses[reply]

HI HORSE WOMEN. Thanks for droping by my talk section, I really appreciate it and it made me feel special!!! I'm on the fast track anyway when it comes to learning and I hope to be able to become on of the review roles on Wikipedia soon and be able to review articles and improve them and all the other roles. Anyways, have a good day!!! Axion Collision (talk) 02:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome :) I'm partly here to explore the inner workings of Wikipedia for my Uni course! I have much to learn! MePoohba (talk) 02:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am notifying you as you asked. Of this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2603:7000:2143:8500:95F7:477A:7FA6:7EB5#Welcome%21 --2603:7000:2143:8500:95F7:477A:7FA6:7EB5 (talk) 06:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Why did you contact me? Are you new at this? I've been editing for quite some time. I just choose to remain anonymous. Why do titled editors at WP invariably assume that anonymous editors are new to WP? Oh, well. Toodles and stay safe. 71.112.241.86 (talk) 07:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most IP editors are, in fact, newer editors. Not all. Since your IP address inevitably changes, it's essentially impossible to distinguish you from newer editors, anyway.

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 07:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Um, ... okay.71.112.241.86 (talk) 07:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I dream of horses! I am happy for my initial steps on this very important page. I haven't mastered editing skills yet, but I hope to learn a lot from other members. Cheers! Ghostshadowow (talk) 13:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC) Ghostshadowow (talk) 13:24, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The Exadel draft page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Exadel) has a note at the top: Was deleted by Kurykh. Could you please let me know what specifically was removed and whether I can do anything in particular to make the page better? Thank you! NastyaAlisina (talk) 13 January 2021 — Preceding undated comment added 16:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 06:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@I dream of horses: Thanks for the clarification!

Thanks for your review of my article. Could you please tell me which parts seemed promotional ? You asked me to quote neutral sources while I noticed many wikipedia articles concerning organizations, quote their mission and objectives from their own website. Why would then my reliable quotes be cancelled ? or Do I have to put a different reference than those of the IIFA website ? Same questions in regard to the pictures. Every organization has a section called gallery. Could you please tell me what is the problem. Thank you in advance for your clarifications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Lardjane (talk • contribs) 21:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 21:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 22:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Dear I dream of horses, thank you for your quick review. Could you please inform me what part of my text was exactly attended to be advertisement? To my mind Wikipedia is lacking of present information about attraction and people really love to read about practical advices. Very Best.

Atrakcjemiast (talk) 21:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC) Dear I dream of horses, thank you for your quick review. Could you please inform me what part of my text was exactly attended to be advertisement? To my mind Wikipedia is lacking of present information about attraction and people really love to read about practical advices. Very Best.[reply]

@Atrakcjemiast: (edit conflict) Wikipedia is ultimately an encyclopedia, and you wrote in a way more appropriate for an encyclopedia.

What's your mother tongue?

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 21:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@I dream of horses: (edit conflict) Thank you for your response. My mother tongue is English. Could you please clarify what was wrong with the text I wrote? I would like to make it conform to the rules so that it could be accepted. Best regards

Atrakcjemiast (talk) 22:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 22:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tagishsimon (talk) 22:44, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 22:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi!! I just wanted to let you know that I really appreciate your greetings! Thank you!! Izlhyl (talk) 00:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC) izlhyl[reply]

Hi I dream of horses. I did leave an edit summary for my removal of content from California megapolitan areas. But to expand on the matter, the content that I removed related to the notion of a single megapolis comprising all the major California urban areas. But there is no such megapolis stretching throughout all of California, there are no sources saying that there is (even the book "The Year 2000", mentioning Sansan, only predicted that such a megapolis would arise in the future, rather than saying it actually exits), and other parts of the article acknowledge this fact. It doesn't make sense to have lists of urban agglomerations and counties included in a supposed unified Californian megalopolis, but not for Northern Californian and Southern Californian megalopolises individually, in an article primarily about the division of California's urban areas into two megalopolises. Furthermore, the lists of counties and of urban agglomerations in the supposed California megalopolis are not sourced, and appear to be made up by wikipedia editors. 24.7.24.119 (talk) 00:40, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, put the explanation in the

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 01:38, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Again, I did leave a brief explanation in the edit summary. I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "Please notify me after replying off my talk page". 24.7.24.119 (talk) 01:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean on the edit before or something?

Ignore the little message off my signature for now; we're convincing on my talk page, not off it. You can

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 02:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I was referring to this edit; see the edit summary "removed parts of the article focusing on the notion of a single California megalopolis, which is not supported by sources and is in conflict with the title of the article". 24.7.24.119 (talk) 02:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to this edit. To avoid this situation in the future, use edit summaries every time.

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 02:39, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

thanks for the welcome msg. I'll have a look at the links you shared asap :) @I dream of horses: MarioBuoninfante (talk) 17:13, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MarioBuoninfante (talk) 17:13, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for telling me but what I edited is true it is a massive abandoned school complex. Anyone that has seen it will see it appears very strangely and is completely abandoned. https://earth.google.com/web/search/Haddonfield+Memorial+High+School,+Kings+Highway+East,+Haddonfield,+NJ/@39.90358064,-75.02571104,18.50349719a,0d,60y,76.19655982h,85.70523652t,0r/data=CigiJgokCQmr-5Q_bDhAEQfSZOLYVzhAGVFWZgmU5yJAIWIGL2JDziJAIhoKFmpMSHVlSDM2YjZDbzJIY1Y1UV9VQ3cQAg

Andrew T Coleman (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 15:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for noticing my editing! I was on Wikipedia a long time ago I don't know how long but not that long it's only now that I have an account and started editing. once again thank you for welcoming me and may God bless your soul. John Yellowstone (talk) 16:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome message. What do you mean to "Please notify me after replying off my talk page?" SanctimoniousDuplicitousBiters (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 13:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I apologize. I am confused. Why am I replying to you off your talk page? SanctimoniousDuplicitousBiters (talk) 14:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 14:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Agreed. As a sporadic longtime user/password loser I’m well aware re notifying but didn’t know why I was replying to you off your talk page. I’d change “after replying” to “if you reply.”SanctimoniousDuplicitousBiters (talk) 16:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SanctimoniousDuplicitousBiters (and also the IP), I'm okay with answering this question directly since it's about my signature. Other people might be uncomfortable answering.

I'm not 100% sure what you're confused about. Are you confused about why one would reply off my talk page?

notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 17:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The phrase "Please notify me after replying off my talk page." is not as clear as it might seem. It's a matter of perspective. From what you seem to want to say, I would write instead something like "If you want a reply, please write on my Talk page", that a more direct way for new users to respond to your Welcome message or ask you a question without needing to understand how to notify you, or anything else.

The phrase tried to say a lot in a very short sentence, in an order that made sense to you but might not make sense to other readers. "Please notify me" sounds like a request, (or an order) on first reading I said to myself why would I notify you? Most readers will never need to notify you and it seems strange to say that part first because it is only necessary to notify you after several other conditions are met. The important condition "after replying" is another way of say if (1) a user wants to reply to your welcome message, and if (2) they make that reply anywhere except on your Talk page, then (3) they a new user (who may not be familiar with how notification works) should make sure to notify you if they want a response. So again I'd suggest rephrasing it, or stick with the welcome message you were using before. -- 109.78.203.202 (talk) 17:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is this better?

notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 17:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Or perhaps just leave out the signature message, and watch-list any talk page where you've made a comment and might want to read replies - especially now we've got the very welcome facility to add a page to your watchlist for a week, or a month or a year, rather than forever? We're all in the same position surely, and don't need to clutter talk pages with messages like this in our signatures? Or have I missed something? PamD 18:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  PamD, multiple reasons, but one very fundamental issue is that I often edit hundreds of talk pages a day if I use Huggle. Huggle hasn't yet integrated the new "temporary watchlist" feature. However, even if it did, I'd still end up with an unusually large watchlist that would need frequenting pruning once users were blocked and pages were either protected or no longer being vandalized.

  I also give out welcome templates while using Huggle, increasing the number of talk pages I edit. I wouldn't give out so many welcome templates semi-automatically, except that I receive enough thanks (sometimes via

  WP:THANKS

  ) for the welcome templates that I find myself slightly reluctant in doing so. People find the templates useful enough that they could give more benefit than whatever negative comes from my "signature clutter."

  So, 99% of the problem is the above two paragraphs, which boils down to "I edit a lot," and 1% is I'm nervous I'll forget to watchlist a talk page when I need to. I do admit that anxiety could well be slightly excessive.

  notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 19:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

  ]

I see your problem, I think. But I'm not sure that the link to

ping}}, including the fact that you need to sign a post in the same edit as adding it, can't just add it as a secondary afterthought edit. That might work? "If replying other than on my talk page please NOTIFY me.", with NOTIFY being the link to a super-clear explanation (including perhaps why you need to specify this, as explained above)? PamD 21:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 08:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hmm, even the paeg at

WP:PING

is a bit much for a newbie and is mostly about being notified rather than notifying. Really the only bit you need is the third paragraph:

You can "mention" a user called Example by making an edit with a link to their user page (writing [[User:Example]], {{u|Example}}, {{User|Example}}, {{user link|Example}}, {{ping|Example}}, {{Yo|Example}}, or {{reply to|Example}}) and signing the edit using four tildes (~~~~). The user "Example" will then get a notification saying where they were mentioned. This is sometimes called "pinging". See Help:Talk pages#Notifications for more information.

And even that is over-long because it gives so many options. Why not just create User:I dream of horses/notifying with that paragraph or a simplified version of it, and perhaps also offer a link "To learn more about notifications, please see Help:Notifications? Then link there from your signature. You're trying to help people with your talk postings, so make it as un-confusing as possible for them to understand how you're asking them to respond. PamD 09:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 10:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Well, I disagree, but it's your signature. Just trying to help ... both you and the newbie editors of whom just two, so far, found their way to this page to express their confusion. Enough. Stay safe. PamD 10:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PamD, while talk page stalkers are welcome to help out, and while you intended to be helpful, I don't think derailing the conversation to "Why have a signature like that at all?" when I'm already responding to genuine newcomers is going to have a helpful impact. It has the potential to confuse them further. Thankfully, the people participating weren't really newcomers, just sporadic in their editing, so I don't think you did any damage.

Since you think

notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 10:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

This is a very very minor point about phrasing, about knowing your audience, about explaining things in the simplest most direct way possible. A new user is likely to already be overwhelmed by a whole lot of information, so better to keep it simple. I've read a little about design, and the frequent recommendation was to state the positive not the negative. So as I said earlier, it would be better to positively request that people reply on your talk page, rather than trying to explain the negative situation and the extra things they should do if they want to reply off your talk page. (Even that phrasing "off my talk page" makes sense to you but does not necessarily make sense to a beginner, who will most likely reply directly under the message and not think about it being on or off anyones talk page.) I encourage you to think not from your own perspective as the writer, an experience editor but from the perspective of the reader, a potentially new user. It is such a minor point I wont belabor it any further, it's your Welcome message, and your signature, you can do it whatever way you like, but it is one message you plan on repeating thousands of times so I thought you would want to make it as a clear as possible.
Look, I don't even understand why you and others think it is a good idea to post Welcome messages in the first place. If it was a such good idea, why has it not been automated already, a built in feature of Wikipedia? (If you want to increase your edit count there are millions of minor errors that need fixing, Category:Pages_using_infobox_film_with_unknown_empty_parameters is just one example, there are many error categories full of relatively easy fixes.) But anyway, this is the last I'll say on it and I'll go back to trying to fix things in article space. I'm sure I'll see your welcome message again soon. -- 109.78.199.136 (talk) 11:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replying on my talk page may disrupt the conversation flow; in that case, it would be considered taboo. I'd risk having even more people complain about a request for replies on my talk page than my current request. Ultimately, if you think

WP:PING

more accessible to newcomers yourself.

As for the question "Why not automate the process of welcoming people?" the process is partially automated through the notification system and User:HostBot. Further use of "welcome bots" has been rejected by the community.

I don't do what I do because it adds to my edit count,

notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 13:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

In regards to " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:BDSabo#January_2021" adding a photo on a Living Person it was directly pulled from the Living Persons Own Twitter account.

BDSabo (talk) 19:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 19:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

A message from BDSabo

Not a problem, I have the screen shot :)

BDSabo (talk) 19:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 19:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I appreciate you think your reports of vandalism are important...but that doesn't mean you can delete 3 of them cause they are "stale" by a couple hours. Just causes their is a backlog doesn't mean you get to break the rules to jump the line and get your vandal blocked.

While sneaky, I'll give you that, I'm pretty sure that's a blockable offense. Also a

notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 06:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@I dream of horses: Well, technically, you didn't do that either. Still, those three vandals live to vandalize another day. In a clear backlog, the reports could have sat there a little longer and got an official mark of "Stale" from an admin. Maybe you have "been doing that for years", doesn't make it right.

It's like if you live in a small town. Just because you have been running a red light at 2 in the morning with no one coming either way and you haven't gotten caught, doesn't mean you still won't, eventually, get pulled over for it. You don't tell the cop "well, I've been doing that for years and haven't gotten a ticket for it." He's not gonna just go "well, you have a good point" and let you go. No, dude! You're getting a bigger fine now! Same logic applies here.

Just here, it would be a longer block. So, just don't do it again. OK? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:11 on January 26, 2021 (UTC)

@

notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 06:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@I dream of horses: I can only speak of the vandal that another and I were reporting, but it has been well over 12 hours. So, the reports are definitely stale now. I'll keep an eye out for the vandal I'm watching (as I already am) and I'll make a special effort to watch the other two. Just please be careful next time. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 07:15 on January 26, 2021 (UTC)

I've edited the Ruqqus Wikipedia page to add credible sources including The Daily Telegraph and CBS News. Maybe you should now reconsider your rejection of Ruqqus' page on Wikipedia? Animal28 (talk) 08:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 08:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I just edited the article Phyllis Robinson and created my first footnote. In the comments space I confessed that this is kind of a SWAG (scientific wild assed guess) and how I came up with the new factoid about this person of whom I have NO first hand knowledge. I just want to make sure someone will look at the edit and delete it if it's factually incorrect. Maybe a family member or whoever created the article gets automatically notified I hope? Anyway the edit's in good faith, and not a politically charged edit so far as I can tell, so I put it in. Thanks administrators for all you do! Tova2014 (talk) 17:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Tova2014 (talk) 17:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 08:10, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]