User talk:IgelRM

Archives

1, 2

Just to let you know, editor IgelRM,

[[Viacom (1952–2006)|Viacom]]

See more about linking at the

You recently edited the DeepL article, and unfortunately put in incorrect information about "Frahlinger". You falsely claim that "Frahlinger resigned as CEO and became lead researcher in July 2019, he had recently got attention for successfully requesting media to delete his public relations photos." This is not true, and also not at all supported by the source (Uepo-Article) you give for your claim. Probably your claim is based on another single web-article from a single private person (not an official publication), who blackmailed F with wrong statements. Please remove these claims, since these are wrong statements about a natural person, and not at all supported by any reliable sources. 84.247.216.86 (talk) 11:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have replied on the article talk page. IgelRM (talk) 13:14, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

84.247.216.86 Addendum here since this is not related to the WP article: I remember reading an article about a legal dispute from an editor of a web magazine (which might be the one you are referring to?), but I reject that I would intentionally try to conflate information from another source into a WP article. I just saw the rather bad spelling mistake of "F" last name, apologies for that since you might be related to the company. Seems like not many people are looking over the article unfortunately (which alleviates errors on an amateur encyclopedia like this). IgelRM (talk) 18:43, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The article is way too underdeveloped to be necessary as separate from the series page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Life Is Strange characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:08, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Eidos Interactive into Square Enix. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated. Most of what I moved was originally written by me. But my edit summary could have been better. IgelRM (talk) 21:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article RELX. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 07:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 19:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here .
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eidos Interactive you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eidos Interactive for comments about the article, and Talk:Eidos Interactive/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@David Fuchs: Thanks for reviewing, my first GA. Probably could do more, but the article is much better than before we started. IgelRM (talk) 22:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including

conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements (it would be helpful if you could please identify, with specificity, which criteria you believe the draft meets?) then resubmit the page and leave a note for me on my talk page

and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Alexis Garavaryan
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 00:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IgelRM! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 00:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kowloon Nights, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OceanHok (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of video game publishers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Pocket Gamer did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks!

I nearly reverted your edit because of unexplained removal of cited material. Please kindly leave an edit summary for all your edits. Peaceray (talk) 04:56, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I forget. Thanks for looking through my edit regardless. I removed the list of awarded games because it was all primary sourced and not particular encyclopedic. IgelRM (talk) 05:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See

WP:CORPDEPTH

. Right now, this is not an article, not do the references convey notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XD Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 23:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IgelRM,

I'd like to encourage you to try out

Thank you for reaching out. I enabled it, maybe I will remember sending "good faith reverts" with this. IgelRM (talk) 09:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shiro Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Les Echos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fashion-Dreamer-Key-Art.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you better look to get consensus for mass removing "indie" from game pages. I would not call the term "undefinable", but it should be used when sources have called a game indie. I know the mess around "Dave the Diver" is one thing, but there's games there that are clear indie examples that you have removed. This might be best to ask at the VG project. Masem (t) 02:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out. I tried to stay safe by only going for use in lead sentence as genre prefix, so generally I shouldn't have removed "indie" mentioning from articles. I don't think there is a reviewed video game article which uses the term in the lead sentence, I will stop for now of course. IgelRM (talk) 02:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you going through and removing "video game" because games were only on a PC platform? Computer games are a subset of video games, and the label is accurate. The general label of "computer game" is fairly antiquated now.

Hey thanks for reaching out. According to video game, computer game is still an accepted alternative term. I felt it is technically misleading to call "PC only" games video games as the video part originally referring to game consoles/television. Computer game appears less common on the internet but is used: GScholar, GBooks. (Some of the articles also unnecessarily linked video game) But realize I have been done rather bold editing recently and should probably take it easy for a bit. IgelRM (talk) 16:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A computer game is still a video game. A video game on PC-only platforms is still a video game. The fact it it is on PC-only does not change it from either "video game" or "computer game" to simply "game". -- ferret (talk) 16:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferret: So we need to word it like a CRPG is a video game? I'm not arguing about what it is, but what we label things. Not arguing about my motivation here, "X is an adventure game" is widely used and I didn't change titles or short descriptions. But I will create VG talk thread.

You edited above message, computer game recently redirected to PC game until June 2023. This might need a hatnote considering PC game still says it is also known as a computer game. IgelRM (talk) 10:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm surprised that you pasted me a template instead of replying to what I said. But I have created a topic on the talk page, please respond there. Regards IgelRM (talk) 21:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pilgrim in the Microworld, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Igel. My name is Lesley and I work for Sophos. In compliance with WP:COI, I disclosed a COI and proposed some edits here. I saw that you edited the page recently and was hoping you might be willing to review my proposed edits as an impartial editor. The edits are to update the CEO and add a Software/Services section. Let me know if you can. Best regards. LesleySullivan (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IgelRM. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at

• usually
  not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using
  general notability guideline
  .
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jawbone (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 01:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IgelRM, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions

• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! – Joe (talk) 11:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IgelRM,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IgelRM,

how can I make WatchMojo have a neutral tone? — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 15:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]