User talk:InfoMCollinson

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, InfoMCollinson! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

...an encyclopedia. That means that EVERYTHING has to be referenced with citations that are considered reliable sources. Content can be true but not allowed if not verified. Your attempt at a draft reads more like magical fiction than fact. Hence, Rejected. If you persist you maybe blocked for 'NOTHERE', which means 'not here to work on the encyclopedia'. David notMD (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at

]

Your thread has been archived

Hi InfoMCollinson! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Your thread has been archived

Hi InfoMCollinson! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

New Users

Should there be emails sent out to regularly update Wikipedia users on news or new pages created ect? Is there anyone else who feels the same way? InfoMCollinson (talk) 15:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thousands of new articles every day (current count >6,000,000), what would be the point? David notMD (talk) 19:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are newsletters you can subscribe to, like The Signpost (subscribe here) or technical news. They usually get delivered to your talk page, and you can enable email alerts for posts to that.

I do wonder if there would be much interest in emailing, tweeting out, etc. main-page content like TFA, ITN, DYK. I suspect that kind of daily update would be too much for most people.
⁓ Pelagic ( messages ) 04:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]