User talk:Isaacsirup

Isaacsirup, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Isaacsirup! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

talk) 01:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Talkback

Hello, Isaacsirup. You have new messages at Talk:Karisma_Kapoor.
Message added 03:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 03:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Isaacsirup. You have new messages at Talk:Dhoom 2.
Message added 03:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

also see Talk:Krishma Kapoor also Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 03:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Isaacsirup. You have new messages at Talk:Karisma_Kapoor.
Message added 03:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 04:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Karisma Kapoor

Namaste, Isaacsirup. You have got at least one new message at the Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Please continue the discussion there!
Message added by Tito☸Dutta 19:25, 14 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time.[reply]

Olympus Has Fallen

You don't get it. Box Office Mojo hasn't been updating it's total foreign box office total on Olympus Has Fallen, which most countries are updating their numbers, but they haven't been updating the exact total box office gross numbers. this link here will tell you about it. BattleshipMan (talk) 03:06, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know about that link as I visit those kind of pages often. I would rather wait until they update than update beforehand--Isaacsirup (talk) 04:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do a math in each country on that link and see for yourself if the total foreign box-office gross numbers is correct, which is won't be. BattleshipMan (talk) 04:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me, Box Office Mojo will update soon. No need to rush.--Isaacsirup (talk) 04:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know you changed the edit on Olympus Has Fallen on good faith, but Box Office Mojo hasn't update the total foreign box-office gross total since April 28th, according to the site itself. Not to mention several countries update their numbers, even though the total numbers are inaccurate. BattleshipMan (talk) 04:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to change it back, go ahead. But use a different updated source--Isaacsirup (talk) 04:34, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Isaacsirup. You have new messages at Talk:Dil Se...
Message added 23:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Vivvt (Talk) 23:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rai

As you were repeatedly reverting your statement based on just one source on her international films, I think I can defend with another popular source proving only 2 films were disasters at BO. The source that you have (http://www.indianexpress.com/news/did-hollywood-flops-cause-ashs-manager-to-quit/769243) doesn't say the Box office verdict.

FYI - It doesn't make any sense to anyone that a film is called success only if it collected gross of $50 million at BO. In the case of Bride and prejudice, With a worldwide gross of $24 million against a production budget of $7 million, the film proved a commercial success. So as provoked & Pink panther based on the budget and its gross revenue it is called a moderate success. In business, Moderate meaning the film didn't failed at the BO.

From Hindustan Times:

Ash has done successful international projects like Bride & Prejudice (2004) and Provoked (2007). While Mistress Of Spices (2005) and The Last Legion (2007) flopped, The Pink Panther 2 (2009) did moderate business. Source : http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/OVER-THE-YEARS-Ash-good-as-it-can-get/Article1-930831.aspx

Cheers, Ssg2442 (talk) 04:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aishwarya Rai Bachchan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Indian film actress and model. She was the runner-up of [[Femina Miss India|Miss India]] in 1994 ((losing out to Sushmita Sen, who went on to become the first woman of Indian origin to win the [[

Thanks,

talk) 14:18, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Talkback

Hello, Isaacsirup. You have new messages at Aishwarya Rai Bachchan's talk page.
Message added 18:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

^{(buzz me)} 18:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

You sure?

Are you sure you really want to support the edit of a banned editor with nearly 200 known sockpuppets? It's your call but that seems awful risky unless you've very carefully examined every single part of that edit to (a) confirm that the sources support it and (b) it's NPOV (which has been one of the major problems with his or her edits). Please confirm that you've done so and are willing to take responsibility for those edits. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 01:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like an answer to my questions, please: Are you standing by the quality and content of those edits that were originally made by a banned editor? Based on the way in which you rapidly reverted several of my edits, it appears that you simply added the content because you didn't understand why I originally removed it. If that's true, it's very important that you vouch for the quality and adherence to policy of this material. NPOV is a special concern because the banned editor in question has had severe POV issues. ElKevbo (talk) 05:53, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"This edit proves that I didn't assume bad faith. Being an old editor certainly doesn't keep you from getting monitored. And likewise, doesn't give you the carte blanche to do whatever you want on Wikipedia. I collectively made a mistake and I duly apologize to the people (or person) who may have been offended by this deed of mine," I wrote on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I am just a fellow editor and I can see that I've completely misjudged you. I apologize. As of now, I don't see any particular problem with the edit in question. The page does need work, but that is the case for almost all university-related articles. I checked quite a few references per your insistance and nothing seems wrong. Maybe you can prove me wrong, but blindly removing such bulk of information does more harm than good.--Isaacsirup^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 06:14, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

As you have already seen in the discussion on ANI, the "yellow" in your signature make is impossible to read. As per the
BWilkins←✎) 09:11, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Ok, I will change it.--Isaacsirup^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 09:14, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Isaacsirup^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 09:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! Thanks for doing that so promptly (
BWilkins←✎) 10:49, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Isaacsirup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No clue about why I got blocked--Isaacsirup^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Look at your user page. You were blocked for sock puppetry. Bbb23 (talk) 23:28, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Now I get it. This happened because of this edit of mine. I have had this terrible experience ever since I joined Wikipedia. I really don't want to leave Wikipedia in this note. I am in no way or form related to the sockpuppet. I am an Indian man. That sockpuppet is an American vandal. Believe me, very few people on Wikipedia can read and write in five languages. English-Wikipedia needs me.--Isaacsirup^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 00:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This was a
wasting our time, your talk page access will probably be revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

I removed the unblock request per your suggestion. Thanks for giving me the heads-up on that. I guess I need to post an unblock request on Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard, but how will I do it?--Isaacsirup^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 00:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this guy really is Mangoeater, then why will a severe damager to the project be so cooperative and do such a thing? I don't believe that this guy is Mangoeater. But one strange thing is, how can a CU get it wrong? I'm just commenting, you can choose to ignore it when processing unblock request.
✉ • ✎) 01:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Another thing, which vandal has ever decorated his signature? Never came across a single one so far in my few months' experience in fighting vandalism.
✉ • ✎) 02:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
They should be spending their time on Wikipedia more "worthwhile" by damaging it, the more the better.
✉ • ✎) 03:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks loads. Thank you all for your kind words and thoughts. Arctic Kangaroo, it's very kind of you. I am overwhelmed and deeply touched by your kindness and the support extended. And I look forward to working with you in the coming future! Even if I don't get unblocked, I'll remember each of you with fondness.--Isaacsirup^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 01:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chance of being a sock after reviewing: 30-70.
✉ • ✎) 03:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan

please see history — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashhhfann (talk • contribs) 07:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied u here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Abhishek_Bachchan&action=edit&section=14 aish.ego (talk) 06:00, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Isaacsirup&oldid=1140431263"