User talk:Ivymike21
Harvard
Hi! Thanks for contacting me. If the Harvard article is, in fact, public domain, it needed to be listed as such. I'll make a note on the copyvio page. Chances are it'll be reverted back to your original version as a result. Best, Lucky 6.9 17:38, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Simpsons
I'm glad you made your "conservatives like The Simpsons now" addition to The Simpsons. I was just watching it today (the "rancho relaxo" one) and was just thinking "this show really is incredibly conservative, deep down". The article could use a quote or a link to a reference of some notable conservative or conservative group praising The Simpsons. -- John Fader (talk | contribs) 20:28, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hi. In response to this edit of yours, and noticing the above conversation, I wonder if you are confused about what public domain means. It does not mean "made widely available". Please refer to linked article for more information. If you actually have proof that those press releases have been released into the public domain, please provide it at Wikipedia:Copyright problems instead of removing the copyright-violation warnings. Jkelly 19:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- If you would like to work on an article that has a copyvio notice on it, you can do so by following the copyvio-notice's link to the Temp subpage. In this case, it is at Hannah_Teter/Temp. I have already moved your contribution there. Jkelly 21:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be
Also, please see discussion at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems. Jkelly 21:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for beginning to discuss the matter, even if that beginning wasn't a stellar model of break with process and not wait a week before removing the copyright infringement. Jkelly 22:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)]
As a courtesy for other editors on Wikipedia, please sign your talk page and user talk page posts. By adding four tildes (~) at the end of your comments, your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added. Jkelly 22:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Wikiality and The Simpsons neologisms
- Oh, I suppose I misunderstood your point about the Simpsons neologisms. Wikipedia doesn't keep a list of "The Word" subjects; why would we start with this one? What makes this one stand out? JDoorjam Talk 20:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- You're absolutely wrong. People add things all the time, and they're deleted all the time. Have you seen WP:CITE. If you want a site where anyone can enter anything they want because they found it interesting, put it on antiwikipedia.com. JDoorjam Talk 20:20, 1 August 2006 (UTC)]
- You're absolutely wrong. People add things all the time, and they're deleted all the time. Have you seen
Sockpuppetry case
![]() |
You have been accused of
]- You have removed the sock puppetry notice from your user page. Please reread the "notes for the suspect" where it states:
- If the accuser has listed evidence against you, you are not allowed to remove the notice from your page for ten days. You are allowed to respond to each and every accusation on the evidence page but are not allowed to remove accusations.
- I am restoring the notice. --BostonMA talk 06:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Ok, Nov 12 then. Though that seems silly. The matter is settled and they've blocked my other account indefinitely. I'm pretty aggrivated since I didn't break any rules with the other account.
- The rules that you broke with the sockpuppet account are:
- sock puppets may not be used to give the impression of more support for a viewpoint. This includes ... using more than one account in a discussion at ... Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, ..., or on talk pages.
- Multiple accounts should not be used as a way of avoiding the scrutiny of your fellow editors by ensuring you leave no audit trail.
- All users, ... are proscribed from operating a "bad hand" account for the purpose of policy violations or disruption.
- You used a "good hand" account to make safe edits, then used your "bad hand" account to remove an AfD tag.
- You stated an untruth with your alternate account in this comment
- "I categorically deny that I am a sock puppet or meat puppet of utzchips, or any other wikipedian." (emphasis added)
- I hope that you will reflect on these issues so that you may improve as an editor of Wikipedia. Sincerely, --BostonMA talk 15:59, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Godspot
A {{
AfD nomination of Cold Generation Y
I have nominated Cold Generation Y, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold Generation Y. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
- Constance DeFotis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Constance DeFotis
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Constance DeFotis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't meet notability for people. The entire article relies on information presented through her place of employment.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Undead Never Die (talk) 10:58, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article The Albino Code has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of The Albino Code for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Albino Code until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.