User talk:JFox3645

Welcome!

Hi JFox3645! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 17:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Madman2001 with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 17:56, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:32, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JFox3645 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not know posting was not the same as editing a user page. I am new here, and I apologized. I am just appalled by the fact that the user I was interacting with. They seem to have gained respect on here, in spite of the fact that they tried to remove an article about an event that historians agree happened. I believe there should be extra scrutiny on their edits due to that. If you unblock me, I'll pay better attention to the rules. I apologize. JFox3645 (talk) 18:52, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This post is appalling and utterly unacceptable in any public forum. You don't have to be aware of a single rule to know this. I am not convinced that such incivility won't recur, so I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:31, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.