User talk:JKJ Moscow
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, JKJ Moscow, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- Article Wizardif you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
New articles
Hi! You've just created couple articles that have no reliable sources (see
The article Dewald v. Clinton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable case, no sources for these claims, apparent OR, no decision even from the district court yet.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
lots of notices about newly created articles not meeting basic article requirements. click SHOW to see the details
|
---|
Speedy deletion nomination of Dewald v. Dewald
A tag has been placed on criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable .
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ...William 20:36, 30 November 2012 (UTC) The article Borracchini v. Jones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons .
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing The article Dept of Revenue v. Nesbitt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons .
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Speedy deletion nomination of Dewald v. Wrigglesworth
A tag has been placed on criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable .
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ...William 20:58, 30 November 2012 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Dewald v. DewaldA tag has been placed on Dewald v. Dewald, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: Under the criteria for speedy deletion , articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ...William 21:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Dewald v. WrigglesworthA tag has been placed on Dewald v. Wrigglesworth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: Under the criteria for speedy deletion , articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ...William 21:59, 30 November 2012 (UTC) The article Dewald v. Wrigglesworth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons .
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing The article Dewald v. Clinton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons .
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing The article Dewald v. United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons .
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing The article Dewald v. Dewald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons .
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing The article Friends of Phil Gramm v Americans for Phil Gramm in '84 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons .
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing |
New article requirements
Hello, I have hidden a bunch of notices about articles that you have recently created. You can see them all by pressing the SHOW button, or ping me and I will remove the coding to expose them all again.
You should probably read
The article Risenhoover v. Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 20:17, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
The article Weinstein v. Albright has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 20:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
The article In re James K. Walker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability. Article is unreferenced
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 21:33, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current