User talk:JTZegers/Archives/2022/November

Archives

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwards (company) (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth
(not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent
of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edwards (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JTZegers! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After one year

Your eagerness to message me so quickly after the period's expiration gives me pause, as does a spotcheck of many of your past 50 edits, many of which still seem "unnecessary" and few of which cite any sources, and those that do cite suboptimal sources such as YouTube or Volsiz.ru (please, please re-read our

stuff on living persons). Ultimately, however, I see nothing that has broken policy or is any worse than countless other contributors, so I'll remove your restrictions and you can at worst be some other admin's problem. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:55, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks. I remember the initial block was for disruptive editing and I should have known better, but I've changed a lot. And I promise, I'll only use AFD as a last resort. JTZegers (talk) 01:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]