User talk:JackWinslow

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stuart Matthew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Matthew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 14:54, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested for new username, I was new to wiki so I didn't new about this rule. So sorry for that.

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

talk) 14:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JackWinslow, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Joseph2302 (talk) 18:06, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

sock puppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 21:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

• For continued socking, your block is now indefinite.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Even if there were no other reason for you to be indefinitely blocked, this edit, where you pretended to be another editor, would have been enough. If you request an unblock, the reviewing administrator will no doubt take that into account, as well as all the other problems, with your editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "

talk) 16:49, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Good For You By Stuart Matthew (HC).ogg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Stuart Matthew During Video Shoot.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]