User talk:Jack at Hillrom

Jack -

Under unintended consequences, attention brought to Hillrom and associated companies has resulted in a proposed deletion for all three (Prod). There is a one week period during which the articles can be improved. Given your Paid status, the usual process for changes would be for you to suggest changes on the articles' Talk pages, then for other, non-affiliated, editors to implement or not. You may consider posting on the talk pages of the editors who initiated the Prod process, asking if it would be OK for you to directly edit the articles in question. The crux of the matter is not the size or history of the companies, but whether people not affiliated with the companies have written about the companies. That is the desired content and citations. David notMD (talk) 15:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David notMD,
Thank you for taking the time to provide additional background and clarity. I will follow your suggestions immediately.
Appreciate your help, again.

--Jack at Hillrom (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jack at Hillrom! You created a thread called First time; incorrect information update request at archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hill-Rom. Your work must be reviewed by a non- conflicted editor prior to it being in the article. YOU are in no position to judge the notability of your employer. John from Idegon (talk) 20:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you made did not one single thing towards showing notability for this company. John from Idegon (talk) 20:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]