User talk:JannatChannel

Hello JannatChannel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. OccultZone (Talk) 13:26, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JannatChannel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. OccultZone (Talk) 13:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good News 4 Music Vol.1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thomas.W ^talk 15:42, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elli Beny W Benak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elli Beny W Benak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thomas.W ^talk 15:46, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hob Emtelak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thomas.W ^talk 15:47, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hob Gamed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thomas.W ^talk 15:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]