User talk:Jaque Hammer

A person reading the title "The White Negro" might think the article is about people who call themselves, or are called by others, "white negroes." Jaque Hammer (talk) 15:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Norman Thaddeus Vane. I have removed the source you complained about. Hopefully you are now satisfied? -- Cirt (talk) 16:47, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Jaque Hammer (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw this article, as a redirect to Fool, and realised the target was an inappropriate one (the meanings are not similar; neither article mentions the other). It got to this stage after you PRODded it and another editor changed to the redirect, implicitly contesting the prod thus preventing it being PRODded again. If you still wish for it to be debated/deleted I suggest AfD. I42 (talk) 19:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is pretty borderline, jaque. I'm letting it go because it is borderline and arguments could be made either way. Note that the word farangi and its derivatives exists in several languages and its origin is not absolutely certain. People encountering 'farangi' in Hindi for example may simply want to look it up as a small succint Wikipedia article on its own (as I originally intended). Now, however, they have to plough through a long article on the Franks to find out the word origin. Hardly efficient. Lgh (talk) 02:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They actually should be looking it up in a reference on the Hindi language. Jaque Hammer (talk) 08:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of

Thanks. I have heard of that but never checked it out. I still think an article should have some sources and something to say about the person besides he has a job and wrote some books. Jaque Hammer (talk) 23:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current