User talk:Javalizard

Please don't add names without citations to the

By the way, citation can't just be some other list somewhere unless it gives sources, in which case you can copy the source they give.

While an individual Reserve Bank could be argued to be "privately owned" (the case you cite only has to do with the Federal Tort Claims Act), the Federal Reserve System is not. The Federal Reserve Board is not privately owned in any way, shape, or form. In addition, the individual Reserve Banks have a third of their directors appointed by a governmental agency, which also has broad authority for directing the Reserve Banks' operations. As such, describing them as "privately owned" is an oversimplification. -Rrius (talk) 19:13, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article already discusses the very case you mentioned, including this quote from the case: "The Reserve Banks have properly been held to be federal instrumentalities for some purposes." The article also says,

So, once again, before trying to add your material again, please take it to the talk page. -Rrius (talk) 19:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

Hello, Javalizard. You have new messages at Mr. Stradivarius's talk page.
Message added 10:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

If sources don't support what you want to say, consider finding a different way to say it, instead of hitting "revert". bobrayner (talk) 05:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've got to be kidding me. Did you even LOOK at the source I added? It TOTALLY supports the ENTIRE section. I suggest you read it and stop editwarring my posts Javalizard (talk) 05:55, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That source says "Thus through stage after stage of expansion, "money" can grow to a total of 10 times the new reserves supplied to the banking system"

You said that, through stage after stage, money can grow 4194304 times. 10 ≠ 4194304.

bobrayner (talk) 06:11, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been

page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. KrakatoaKatie 06:19, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]