User talk:JenSmith27

Hello, JenSmith27. You have new messages at JenSmith27's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for taking the time to review my work. I am fairly new and not certain what the problem is with the reference list that is causing the article to be on hold. Any clarification and specific changes that you need would be greatly appreciated! Thanks so much :)

JenSmith27 (talk) 16:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC)JenSmith27[reply]

Alright, re-reviewed it's all good now. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 22:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much FD:) Only one question, I looked over the rating system and noticed that for C class one of the main issues is not reliable sources, I have the Wall Street Journal, Several .gov sites with official documents, a published study straight from the mayo clinic and USA Today. I thought these were all pretty credible sources. Please let me know your thought on this as I would love to improve this as much as possible.

Government websites, established research institutes and established newspapers and authors are credible sources. The Wall Street Journal would fall under this category. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 00:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KwikMed, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's
  grading scheme
  to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to
  create articles yourself
  , and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 22:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:KwikMedLogo.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

• As a general rule of thumb, a logo should be tagged as a {{Non-free logo}} and used in articles about the related company/product under the WP:Non-free content guidelines. Permission of the owner of the image is not required for these sorts of non-free images. —C.Fred (talk) 22:37, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]