User talk:Jersey92

Archives

1, 2, 3

Hi there. I do want to reach a consensus on the Yisroel Belsky page. I see from your comments that most of your concern is not to use biased sources and not to whitewash issues, and I do agree with that. Actua718 (talk) 19:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The concern is that Wikipedia articles must be sourced with

WP:RS cover a topic it won't be whitewashed.--Jersey92 (talk) 20:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Jersey92 This is Hollysomerset... My club paws page was only an expirament - I don't care it was deleted. Thanks for leaving a 'user talk' for me - my first! I started doing this today. I'll check out what you've done so far to help wikki. Thanks again, Holly — Preceding Holly Somerset (talk) 22:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC) comment added by Hollysomerset (talk • contribs) 22:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please use a Userspace page for that and not test in the main encyclopedia. See

WP:HUD. Thank you. --Jersey92 (talk) 22:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Jersey92. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jersey92. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article you worked on or cited is being deleted and you should state your opinion about it. Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2018_May_7#Joseph_Steinberg Thetechgirl (talk) 21:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jersey92. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jersey92,

I've seen you changed my edit on the Landsberg Prison page back to what it was before. Would you care to let me know why? You're clearly the more experienced user of us two, but as stated on the talk page of that article there are good reasons for assuming the person is indeed not Franz Strasser, and you unfortunately didn't leave a comment/explanation on that talk page. Ception (talk) 22:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The caption of the image in Wiki says it is Strasser. Please feel free to fix both if you believe it is incorrect. Jersey92 (talk) 01:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is true. But that image has as a source only some small private blog, which itself does not mention any sources. It does not appear to be trustworthy at all. At the same time some pictures of original newspaper articles dating back to Strasser's hanging show clearly that the wooden frame looked different than on that picture. Furthermore there are a few other problems with the picture (mentioned by Kauko here and also here, on the discussion page for the picture itself). So all in all it appears that the caption for that picture is wrong in the first place.Ception (talk) 01:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I just saw the second part of your message. I'm not sure how Wikimedia works. I can of course edit the caption, but what do I do with the link referring to the blog the picture originated from? Somebody following it will still see the blog claiming it is Franz Strasser.Ception (talk) 01:19, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix in Wiki, and let the blog owner know. --Jersey92 (talk) 18:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]