User talk:Jilola
Welcome!
Hello, Jilola, and
welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions
. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place
]
{{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Prolog (talk) 10:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Lapsiporno.info
Hey. You are right that mentioning the law is a good idea, but I think a full section looks too off-topic in that article. It would suit better for
Internet censorship in Finland if those articles existed. Maybe just add a sentence or two after NBI's Henriksson's statement (where I think this information would suit best)? Prolog (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
]
- I had to remove some of your additions as original research, and reworded a bit and added one reference. Please always try to find a source to back up the claims. Thanks, Prolog (talk) 21:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)]
It's not a good idea to import translated law text, because that's outside the purpose of an
2005 amendment to the Finnish Copyright Act and Penal Code. Prolog (talk) 21:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
]
- Sorry, from your previous question I got the idea that you were going to set up a new article consisting only of your translations. Of course you can translate and quote important parts of the law in a relevant article (see United States Constitution and United States Bill of Rights). Prolog (talk) 01:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)]
- As long as the page doesn't cover the subject by only including law text and translated law text, it should be fine. Maybe the article is not really necessary at the moment, but ]